Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 25;10:2232. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02232

TABLE 3.

Similarity matrix showing the ANIb values between the strains under study (belonging to L. plantarum) and type strains of related species (16S rRNA gene sequence similarity >98.6% in EzBioCloud Database).

ANIb 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 L. plantarum CECT 8962
2 L. plantarum CECT 8963 98.4 -
3 L. plantarum CECT 8964 98.4 100.0
4 L. plantarum CECT 8965 98.3 99.8 99.8
5 L. plantarum CECT 8966 98.3 99.8 99.8 100.0
6 L. fabifermentans DSM 21115T 75.3 75.3 75.3 75.3 75.3
7 L. herbarum TCF032-E4T 76.7 76.7 76.7 76.7 76.8 74.5
8 L. paraplantarum DSM 10667T 85.6 85.5 85.5 85.6 85.6 74.9 77.1
9 L. pentosus DSM 20314T 79.4 79.4 79.4 79.4 79.5 75.0 76.5 79.4
10 L. plantarum subsp. argentoratensis DSM 16365T 94.9 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 74.9 76.6 85.4 79.8
11 L. plantarum subsp. plantarum ATCC 14917T 98.5 98.6 98.6 98.6 98.6 74.5 76.7 85.2 79.2 94.9
12 L. xiangfangensis LMG 26013T 76.2 76.2 76.2 76.3 76.2 75.4 75.7 76.1 79.8 76.3 75.4

Values above the threshold for species delineation (95%) are in bold.