Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 12.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2019 Jun 12;570(7761):338–343. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1295-z

Extended Data Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics

NLRP3-NEK7 Talos Arctica dataset NLRP3-NEK7 Titan Krios dataset
Data collection and processing
Magnification 105,000 165,000
Voltage (keV) 200 300
Electron exposure (e−/Å2) ~59 ~55
Defocus range (μm) −0.5 to −3.0 −0.8 to −3.0
Super Resolution pixel size (Å) 0.589 0.42
Symmetry imposed C1 C1
Initial particle images (no.) 1,086,055 1,850,332
Final particle images (no.) 98,340 108,771
Map resolution (Å) 4.3 3.8
FSC threshold 0.143 0.143
Map resolution range (Å) 3.5–5.8 2.5–6.6
Refinement
Initial model used
Model resolution (Å) 4.3
 FSC threshold 0.5
Model resolution range (Å) 2.5–6.6
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) −100
Model composition
Non-hydrogen atoms 7979
Protein residues 980
Ligands 1
B factors (Å2)
 Protein 132.7
 Ligand 96.7
R.m.s. deviations
 Bond lengths (Å) 0.006
 Bond angles (°) 1.345
Validation
 MolProbity score 2.35
 Clashscore 8.92
 Poor rotamers (%) 1.91
Ramachandran plot
 Favoured (%) 84.96
 Allowed (%) 14.02
 Disallowed (%) 1.02