. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 2.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Econ. 2019 Apr 23;5(2):165–190. doi: 10.1162/ajhe_a_00115

Table 7.

Estimates of treatment effect (β₁) by cut-off point, full sample

	Cut-off point

Model	1–2	2–3	3–4	4–5
All	−0.005 >(0.008)	0.016^* >(0.009)	0.018^* >(0.009)	0.010 >(0.008)

Occupancy < 0.95	−0.019^** >(0.009)	0.026^*** >(0.010)	0.021^** >(0.011)	0.018^* >(0.010)

Ti	−0.002 >(0.017)	0.022 >(0.015)	−0.028^* >(0.016)	0.008 >(0.015)
HHI < 0.25	0.15^*** >(0.035)	0.180^*** >(0.041)	0.173^*** >(0.048)	0.048 >(0.046)
Ti^*(HHI < 0.25)	−0.003 >(0.017)	−0.007 >(0.015)	0.056^*** >(0.016)	0.004 >(0.015)

Notes: Standard errors in parentheses.

^{*, **, and ***}

indicate treatment effects significantly different between treatment and control nursing homes at 90%, 95%, and 99% confidence levels, respectively.

All models control for payer mix, chain status, hospital-based indicator, type of ownership, Herfindahl– Hirschman Index (except for models controlling for HHI <0.25), Cognitive performance scores, occupancy rate, number of beds, demographics characteristics (education and race), and ratings in the quality and staffing domains.