Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Sep;156(3):312–325. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.005

Table 2.

Practitioner/practice characteristics according to most ideal treatment recommendation category

Treatment category1
Cluster adjusted4 p-values
ALL (N=345) Aligners only
(N=35)
Fixed appliances
(N=146)
Temporary
Anchorage
Devices (N=35)
Orthognathic
surgery (N=129)
ALN vs.
FA
FA vs.
TADs
TADs
vs SX
SX:
yes/no
Practitioner characteristics N Col %2 N Row3 % N Row3 % N Row3 % N Row3 % p p p p
Specialty NE5 NE NE NE
 General practice 3 1% 0 0% 0 0% 3 100% 0 0%
 Orthodontist 342 99% 35 10% 146 43% 32 9% 129 38%
Country trained in 0.99 .9 0.4 0.98
 United States 279 81% 28 10% 124 44% 24 9% 103 37%
 Other 66 19% 7 11% 22 33% 11 17% 26 39%
Gender 0.06 0.16 0.4 0.7
 Male 254 74% 17 7% 112 44% 27 11% 98 39%
 Female 91 26% 18 20% 34 37% 8 9% 31 34%
Race/ethnicity NE NE NE 0.007
 Caucasian 200 58% 13 7% 73 37% 20 10% 94 47%
 Asian 101 29% 13 13% 44 44% 14 14% 30 30%
 Hispanic/Latino 38 11% 9 24% 24 63% 1 3% 4 11%
 Other/unknown 6 2% 0 0% 5 83% 0 0% 1 17%
Age 0.8 0.8 0.12 0.06
 < 45 yeaars 134 39% 13 10% 70 52% 14 10% 37 28%
 45 – 54 years 78 23% 10 13% 20 26% 13 17% 35 45%
 55 – 64 years 110 32% 3 3% 51 46% 7 6% 49 45%
 65+ years 23 7% 9 39% 5 22% 1 4% 8 35%
Years since dental degree 0.9 0.7 0.08 0.13
 < 10 years 37 11% 3 8% 23 62% 4 11% 7 19%
 10 – 19 years 129 37% 12 9% 56 43% 15 12% 46 36%
 20 – 29 years 85 25% 8 9% 26 31% 12 14% 39 46%
 30+ years 93 27% 12 13% 41 44% 4 4% 36 39%
Type of practice 0.4 NE NE 0.4
 Solo, private prtice 154 45% 15 10% 56 36% 17 11% 66 43%
 Owner, non-solo private 72 21% 8 11% 37 51% 3 4% 24 33%
 Associate in private 35 10% 7 20% 21 60% 3 9% 4 11%
 Preferred provider 15 4% 1 7% 8 53% 0 0% 6 40%
 Academic 64 19% 4 6% 22 34% 12 19% 26 41%
Region NE NE NE 0.6
 Western 161 47% 20 12% 55 34% 19 12% 67 42%
 Midwest 33 10% 0 0% 17 52% 2 6% 14 42%
 Southwest 38 11% 7 18% 10 26% 6 16% 15 39%
 South Central 20 6% 0 0% 10 50% 0 0% 10 50%
 South Atlantic 38 11% 0 0% 23 61% 5 13% 10 26%
 Northeast 55 16% 8 15% 31 56% 3 5% 13 24%
1

Treatment categories are mutually exclusive (see Table 1); 2 are excluded as none of the 4 primary treatments above were recommended

2

Overall column percent (denominator=345); columns not summing to 100 are due to rounding

3

Row %: Percent of specified treatment within category of practitioner/practice characteristic

4

Adjusted for patient clustering within practitioner using generalized estimating equations

5

NE: Not estimable