Table 2.
Treatment category1 |
Cluster adjusted4 p-values |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALL (N=345) | Aligners
only (N=35) |
Fixed
appliances (N=146) |
Temporary Anchorage Devices (N=35) |
Orthognathic surgery (N=129) |
ALN vs. FA |
FA vs. TADs |
TADs vs SX |
SX: yes/no |
||||||
Practitioner characteristics | N | Col %2 | N | Row3 % | N | Row3 % | N | Row3 % | N | Row3 % | p | p | p | p |
Specialty | NE5 | NE | NE | NE | ||||||||||
General practice | 3 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 3 | 100% | 0 | 0% | ||||
Orthodontist | 342 | 99% | 35 | 10% | 146 | 43% | 32 | 9% | 129 | 38% | ||||
Country trained in | 0.99 | .9 | 0.4 | 0.98 | ||||||||||
United States | 279 | 81% | 28 | 10% | 124 | 44% | 24 | 9% | 103 | 37% | ||||
Other | 66 | 19% | 7 | 11% | 22 | 33% | 11 | 17% | 26 | 39% | ||||
Gender | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.4 | 0.7 | ||||||||||
Male | 254 | 74% | 17 | 7% | 112 | 44% | 27 | 11% | 98 | 39% | ||||
Female | 91 | 26% | 18 | 20% | 34 | 37% | 8 | 9% | 31 | 34% | ||||
Race/ethnicity | NE | NE | NE | 0.007 | ||||||||||
Caucasian | 200 | 58% | 13 | 7% | 73 | 37% | 20 | 10% | 94 | 47% | ||||
Asian | 101 | 29% | 13 | 13% | 44 | 44% | 14 | 14% | 30 | 30% | ||||
Hispanic/Latino | 38 | 11% | 9 | 24% | 24 | 63% | 1 | 3% | 4 | 11% | ||||
Other/unknown | 6 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 5 | 83% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 17% | ||||
Age | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.12 | 0.06 | ||||||||||
< 45 yeaars | 134 | 39% | 13 | 10% | 70 | 52% | 14 | 10% | 37 | 28% | ||||
45 – 54 years | 78 | 23% | 10 | 13% | 20 | 26% | 13 | 17% | 35 | 45% | ||||
55 – 64 years | 110 | 32% | 3 | 3% | 51 | 46% | 7 | 6% | 49 | 45% | ||||
65+ years | 23 | 7% | 9 | 39% | 5 | 22% | 1 | 4% | 8 | 35% | ||||
Years since dental degree | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.08 | 0.13 | ||||||||||
< 10 years | 37 | 11% | 3 | 8% | 23 | 62% | 4 | 11% | 7 | 19% | ||||
10 – 19 years | 129 | 37% | 12 | 9% | 56 | 43% | 15 | 12% | 46 | 36% | ||||
20 – 29 years | 85 | 25% | 8 | 9% | 26 | 31% | 12 | 14% | 39 | 46% | ||||
30+ years | 93 | 27% | 12 | 13% | 41 | 44% | 4 | 4% | 36 | 39% | ||||
Type of practice | 0.4 | NE | NE | 0.4 | ||||||||||
Solo, private prtice | 154 | 45% | 15 | 10% | 56 | 36% | 17 | 11% | 66 | 43% | ||||
Owner, non-solo private | 72 | 21% | 8 | 11% | 37 | 51% | 3 | 4% | 24 | 33% | ||||
Associate in private | 35 | 10% | 7 | 20% | 21 | 60% | 3 | 9% | 4 | 11% | ||||
Preferred provider | 15 | 4% | 1 | 7% | 8 | 53% | 0 | 0% | 6 | 40% | ||||
Academic | 64 | 19% | 4 | 6% | 22 | 34% | 12 | 19% | 26 | 41% | ||||
Region | NE | NE | NE | 0.6 | ||||||||||
Western | 161 | 47% | 20 | 12% | 55 | 34% | 19 | 12% | 67 | 42% | ||||
Midwest | 33 | 10% | 0 | 0% | 17 | 52% | 2 | 6% | 14 | 42% | ||||
Southwest | 38 | 11% | 7 | 18% | 10 | 26% | 6 | 16% | 15 | 39% | ||||
South Central | 20 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 10 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 10 | 50% | ||||
South Atlantic | 38 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 23 | 61% | 5 | 13% | 10 | 26% | ||||
Northeast | 55 | 16% | 8 | 15% | 31 | 56% | 3 | 5% | 13 | 24% |
Treatment categories are mutually exclusive (see Table 1); 2 are excluded as none of the 4 primary treatments above were recommended
Overall column percent (denominator=345); columns not summing to 100 are due to rounding
Row %: Percent of specified treatment within category of practitioner/practice characteristic
Adjusted for patient clustering within practitioner using generalized estimating equations
NE: Not estimable