Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: Palgrave Commun. 2019 Mar 26;5:34. doi: 10.1057/s41599-019-0242-9

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Relative difference of regional outflow (A) and inflow (B) between Period 2011 and Period 2012. The migrations were estimated by the CDRLM using only CDRs, and the adjusted CDR data of Period 2012 were used to offset the impact of the increasing mobile phone ownership across periods. The numbers of migrants by region in Period 2011 and Period 2012 are presented under the name of each region, respectively, and the Zambezi region as a significant outliner is excluded.