Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2019 Nov 1;33(13):1995–2004. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002308

Table 2:

Pharmacokinetic results by ART category and implant type

Unadjusted1 Adjusted2
ART category # women (samples) Pre-ART GM hormone concentrations (pg/mL) 3 Post-ART GM hormone concentrations (pg/mL) 3 Observed Pre-ART: Post-ART GMR4 Predicted ART: No ART GMR5 (90% CI) p-value Predicted ART: No ART GMR5 (90% CI) p-value
Levonorgestrel ART-naïve 14 (85) 441.95 402.40 0.91 Ref -- Ref --
EFV 8 (33) 333.40 89.91 0.27 0.33 (0.27, 0.41) <0.001 0.39 (0.31, 0.49) <0.001
NVP 6 (36) 460.01 330.23 0.72 0.84 (0.67, 1.04) 0.17 0.93 (0.74. 1,18) 0.64
Etonogestrel ART-naïve 22 (140) 255.74 204.79 0.80 Ref -- Ref --
EFV 3 (16) 218.38 132.91 0.61 0.57 (0.38, 0.84) 0.02 0.51 (0.34, 0.76) 0.006
NVP 7 (36) 305.05 218.82 0.72 0.88 (0.67, 1.15) 0.42 1.07 (0.77, 1.50) 0.73

ART=antiretroviral therapy; GM=geometric mean; GMR=geometric mean ratio; EFV=efavirenz; NVP=nevirapine

1

Adjusted only for days from ART initiation

2

Adjusted for days from ART initiation, age, BMI, nationality, and closest viral load

3

The median time for each ART-naïve woman was used to split the observations into “pre-ART” and “post-ART” so as to facilitate intra-subject comparisons in this group

4

The observed GMR is intra-subject, calculated as the ratio between geometric means of observed pre- and post-ART initiation samples

5

The no ART (reference) category GMRs from models include all samples from ART-naïve women as well as pre-ART samples from those who initiated ART during study, in order to better estimate changes due to initiating ART while accounting for background change in concentrations over time. Thus, these models incorporate information from within women and well as between women.