Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Jul 23;28(10):1594–1603. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0387

Table 1.

Characteristics of 38 studies that evaluated the association between clinical prostatitis and prostate cancer published from 1971-2018.

First Author Publication
Year
Study Location Data Collection
Period
Participant Age Range
at the Time of
Prostatitis Assessment
Method of
Prostatitis
Assessment
Cases/Controls1 Type of
Controls
OR (95% CI)2 Methods used
to Reduce
Detection Bias3
Quality
Score4
Cohort and Nested Case-Control (n=10)
Rybicki 2016 USA 1990-2002 -- MR 574/574 NCC 0.82 (0.58-1.15) 2, 3 4
Vaarala 2016 Finland 1996-2012 20-59 SAQ 40/1,732 -- 2.64 (2.14-3.11)5 -- 2
Hung 2013 Taiwan 1996-2008 67 (mean) MR 1,184/4,736 NCC 9.77 (3.09-30.9) 2 3
Cheng 2010 USA 2002-2006 45-69 SAQ 1,631/66,210 -- 1.30 (1.10-1.54) 1, 2 5
Weinmann 2010 USA 1964-2000 45-84 MR 768/929 NCC 1.0 (0.79-1.4) 3 5
Daniels 2009 USA 1996-2006 51-99 MR 65/195 NCC 0.37 (0.01-2.82)5 2 3
Huang 2008 USA 1993-2001 60-69 (IQR) SAQ 868/1,283 NCC 1.34 (0.98-1.84)5 2 2
Sutcliffe 2006 USA 1992-2002 46-81 SAQ 2,230/33,356 -- 1.08 (0.96-1.20) 1, 2 7
Zhu 1996 USA 1989-1991 40-69 MR/SAQ 151/243 NCC 1.11 (0.56-2.21)5 1 4
Hiatt 1994 USA 1978-1985 ≥30 MR 177/177 NCC 1.1 (0.5-2.3) 1 6
Retrospective Studies (n=28)
AlQadire 2018 Jordan 2016 21-93 MR 165/177 Hospital 4.76 (2.63-9.09)6 -- 3
Doat 2017 France 2012-2013 40-75 INT 819/879 POP 1.48 (1.05-2.12)5 -- 4
Nair-Shalliker 2017 Australia 2006-2014 19-94 SAQ 1,180/862 Other7 2.30 (1.44-3.70) 3 4
Boehm 2016 Canada 2005-2012 59-70 INT 1,884/1,965 POP 1.81 (1.44-2.27) 2, 3 6
Hennis 2013 Barbados 2002-2011 67 (mean) INT 963/941 POP 3.16 (1.92-5.19) -- 8
Wright 2012 USA 1993-2005 35-74 INT 1,752/1645 POP 1.62 (1.29-2.03)5 1 4
Hosseini 2010 Iran 2005-2008 -- INT 137/137 POP 31.5 (9.2-170.5) -- 5
Liu 2007 China 2000-2006 40-86 (cases) SAQ 40/60 POP 4.67 (1.35-16.15)5 -- 3
Hospital 6.33 (1.62-24.77)5
Pelucchi 2006 Italy 1985-1992 <80 INT 280/689 Hospital 0.53 (0.10-2.68) -- 6
Sarma 2006 USA 1996-2001 40-79 INT 129/703 POP 4.93 (2.79-8.74) 3 6
Daniels 2005 USA 2000-2002 ≥65 SAQ 695/5125 -- 5.40 (4.42-6.60) 2, 3 2
Patel 2005 USA 1996-1998 50-74 INT 669/596 POP 1.8 (1.1-2.9) -- 7
Lightfoot 2004 Canada 1995-1998 45-84 INT/SAQ 741/1,608 POP 0.73 (0.48-1.11) 1 6
Roberts 2004 USA 1979-1997 70 (median) MR 409/803 POP 1.7 (1.1-2.6)8 1 5
Bock 2003 USA 1995-2002 31-84 SAQ 60/64 --9 3.59 (1.20-10.70)5 -- 3
Ritchie 2003 USA 2000-2001 44-85 SAQ 58/99 Hospital 3.44 (1.30-9.13) -- 4
Ning 2000 China 1997-1999 -- INT 96/96 POP 7.00 (3.34-14.68)5 -- 4
Hospital 10.27 (4.67-22.55)5
Wang 1996 China 1989-1992 40 - 80 INT 117/296 POP 4.86 (2.57-9.20) -- 5
Hospital 6.57 (2.75-15.65)
John 1995 USA/Canada 1987-1991 70 (mean) INT 1,642/1,636 POP 2.81 (2.32-3.41)5 -- 4
Wei 1994 China -- - INT 27/54 Hospital 5.26 (1.07-28.80) -- 3
Nakata 1993 Japan 1985-1990 53-93 SAQ 294/294 POP 4.46 (2.71-7.36) -- 4
Honda 1988 USA 1979-1982 ≤60 INT 216/216 POP 2.2 (1.2-4.3) -- 5
Checkoway 1987 USA 1984-1985 50+ INT 40/64 BPH 0.38 (0.01-4.11)5 2 3
Mishina 1985 Japan -- 47-86 INT 100/100 POP 1.64 (0.77-3.47)5,10 2 4
Ross 1983 USA 1972-1982 <80 INT 110/110 POP 1.20 (0.48-3.10)5 -- 6
Baker 1981 USA 1977-1979 54-79 INT/SAQ 44/90 --11 0.24 (0.01-1.89)5 2 3
Niijma 1980 Japan 1963-1978 40-90 MR 187/200 Hospital 1.00 (0.65-1.53)12 -- 1
Wynder 1971 USA 1965-1969 35-89 INT 300/400 Hospital 2.34 (0.91-6.02)5 1 2

Abbreviations: OR-Odds ratio, IQR-inter quartile range, SAQ-self-administered questionnaire, MR-medical record, INT-Interview, White-W, Black-B, Hispanic-H, Other-Other race, DK-Unknown race, NCC-Nested case-control, POP-population-based controls.

1

Values indicate non-missing prostatitis responses.

2

Primary OR estimate presented in either the abstract, main table, or conclusion of the manuscript, or in a previous meta-analysis.

3

Detection bias methodology: (1) Excluding proximal prostatitis diagnoses (ie., near in time to prostate cancer diagnosis); (2) Stratification or restriction based on prostate cancer screening; (3) Adjustment by prostate cancer screening; (--) No method used to reduce detection bias.

4

Quality scores: (1-3) Low Quality; (4-5) Moderate Quality; (6-10) High Quality.

5

Calculated from contingency table values within the article with confidence intervals estimated using Cornfield’s method or exact tests when expected cell frequencies < %5.

6

Based on the text and crude OR, assumed that the adjusted OR was presented in an inverse fashion.

7

Spouses of other cancer patients.

8

We selected this estimate for our “best estimate” analysis acknowledging that many estimates were provided within this study, but that this estimated reported in the abstract represented the summary effect estimate.

9

Entire study population was selected due to a prior family history of prostate cancer or prostate conditions.

10

Exposure defined as history of prostatitis or urethritis.

11

Entire study population was cross-sectionally selected due to an underlying BPH diagnosis.

12

Value presented as no association within the article, so OR=1.0 assumed and 95%CI estimated based on number of cases and controls and estimated prevalence of prostatitis in other early studies.