Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jun 20;25(19):5843–5851. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0863

Table 1.

Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics in 507 patients who underwent resection of CLM

Characteristic Value
Patient factors
 Age, median (IQR), yr 55 (46–62)
 Sex, male : female, n 286 : 221
 ASA score ≥ 3, n (%) 442 (87.2%)
Primary lesion factors
 Location, colon : rectum, n 358 : 149
 T category ≥ 3, n (%)* 436 (87.4)
 Lymph node metastasis, n (%)* 354 (71.8)
Liver metastases clinical factors
 Prehepatectomy CEA level, median (IQR), ng/mL 4.0 (2.2–12.5)
 Synchronous metastasis, n (%) 382 (75.3%)
 Extrahepatic metastasis, n (%) 83 (16.4%)
 Prehepatectomy chemotherapy, n (%) 455 (89.7%)
  > 6 cycles, n (%) 142 (28.0%)
  Oxaliplatin-containing regimen 374 (73.8%)
  Irinotecan-containing regimen 107 (21.1%)
  With anti-VEGF agent, n (%) 356 (70.2%)§
  With anti-EGFR agent, n (%) 39 (7.7%)
Liver metastases histopathologic factors
 Tumor number, median (IQR) 2 (1–4)
 Maximum diameter, median (IQR), cm 2.5 (1.5–4.0)
 R1 surgical margin, n (%) 104 (20.5%)

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.

*

Data not available for T category in 8 patients and lymph node metastasis in 14 patients.

Patients with RAS mutation vs. patients with RAS wild-type.191 (74.3%) vs. 183 (73.2%), P = 0.840.

Patients with RAS mutation vs. patients with RAS wild-type.49 (19.1%) vs. 58 (23.2%), P = 0.277.

§

Patients with RAS mutation vs. patients with RAS wild-type.183 (71.2%) vs. 173 (69.2%), P = 0.629.

Patients with RAS mutation vs. patients with RAS wild-type.4 (1.6%) vs. 35 (14.0%), P < 0.001.