Table 2.
Performance comparison of the proposal sensor for EE2 detection with other sensors.
| Sample | Electrode | Method | Linger rage (μM) |
Detection limit (μM) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EE2 | (Chi/CNT)3/FTO | DPV | 0.05–20 | 0.09 | 9 |
| EE2 | CPB/CPE | DPV | 0.05–20 | 0.03 | 10 |
| E2 | BPIDS/GCE | DPV | 0.1–10 | 0.05 | 41 |
| E1 | Pt/MWCNTs | DPV | 2–50 | 0.84 | 42 |
| EE2 | Pd/g-C3N4-CNTs | DPV | 2–150 | 0.50 | This work |
a(Chi/CNT)3/FTO: Chitosan/multi-walled carbon nanotubes/fluorine doped tin oxide.
bCPB/CPE: Cetyl pyridine bromide/ carbon paste electrode.
cBPIDS/GCE: 1-butyl-3-[3-(N-pyrrolyl)propyl]imidazolium dodecyl sulfate/glassy carbon electrode.