Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 20;10(20):4754–4764. doi: 10.7150/jca.32833

Table 2.

The meta-regression analysis in the binary classification of variable data using the odds ratio (OR)

LogOR Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
Regulation mode -1.302928 0.492039 -2.65 0.016 -2.336663 -0.2691922
miRNA profiling 1.869125 0.7728873 2.42 0.026 0.2453491 3.492901
Sample size -0.9457466 0.841248 -1.12 0.276 -2.713143 0.8216499
Internal reference types 0.7083823 0.525466 1.35 0.194 -0.3955807 1.812345
Specimen types 0.5501442 0.8642539 0.64 0.532 -1.265586 2.365874
Ethnicity 1.472494 1.404431 1.05 0.308 -1.478106 4.423094
Control-CHB 1.596359 0.7393835 2.16 0.043 0.0587269 3.133991
Control-LC 1.99139 0.7978941 2.50 0.021 0.332078 3.650701
Control-CHB+LC 0.9694282 0.8318447 1.17 0.257 -0.7604876 2.699344

LogOR was used as response variables as well as regulation modes, miRNA profiling, sample size, internal reference types, specimen types, ethnicity, and source of controls group were as covariates. Estimate of between-study variance tau2 = 0.6265. Residual variation due to heterogeneity: I-squared_res = 66.64%. Proportion of between-study variance explained: Adj R-squared = 47.42%. Joint test for all covariates with Knapp-Hartung modifcation: Prob > F = 0.0712.