Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 28;10(21):5212–5222. doi: 10.7150/jca.31697

Table 1.

Clinicopathologic correlation of AIB1 expression in cervical cancer.

AIB1 expression P value a
Variables All cases High expression Low expression
Age b 0.350
≤50 75 41(39.6) 34(35.4)
>50 33 16(17.4) 17(15.6)
WHO grade 0.925
G1 49 25(25.9) 24(23.1)
G2 38 21(20.1) 17(17.9)
G3 21 11(11.1) 10(9.9)
FIGO stage 0.003
II stage 32 9(16.9) 23(15.1) III vs IV=0.465
III stage 42 25(22.2) 17(19.8) II vs IV=0.001
IV stage 34 23(17.9) 11(16.1) II vs III=0.007
T status 0.027
T2 37 13(19.5) 24(17.5) T3 vs T4=0.065
T3 45 27(23.8) 18(21.3) T2 vs T4=0.018
T4 26 17(13.7) 9(12.3) T2 vs T3=0.025
N status 0.021
N0 71 32(37.5) 39(33.5)
N1 37 25(19.5) 12(17.5)
M status 0.015
M0 82 38(43.3) 44(38.7)
M1 26 19(13.7) 7(12.3)
CRT response 0.014
CR 46 18(24.3) 28(21.7)
Non-CR 62 39(32.7) 23(29.3)

a Chi-square test; b Median age;

T status: T stages; N status: lymph nodes status; M status: Distant metastasis;

CR: Complete response/complete remission; CRT: chemoradiotherapy; P: P value;