Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 28;10(21):5049–5056. doi: 10.7150/jca.31539

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the factors influencing OS by Cox proportional hazard model

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Age (year)
≤60 vs. >60 1.374 (0.923-2.048) 0.118
Gender
Female vs. Male 1.224 (0.799-1.876) 0.353
Primary tumor site
Colon vs. Rectum 1.837 (1.235-2.732) 0.003 2.174 (1.448-3.364) <0.001
T stage
1-3 vs. 4 1.096 (0.746-1.611) 0.639
N stage
0 vs. 1-2 1.955 (1.271-3.005) 0.002 2.414 (1.552-3.754) <0.001
Histological
Well/moderate vs. Poor 1.472 (0.861-2.518) 0.157
Liver metastases tumor size (cm)
≤2.3 vs. >2.3 1.476 (0.987-2.207) 0.058
Liver metastases number
Single vs. Multiple 1.685 (1.128-2.518) 0.011 2.027 (1.343-3.058) 0.001
Hepatic resection timing
Synchronous vs. Metachronous 1.297 (0.871-1.930) 0.200
CEA (ng/ml)
≤5 vs. >5 1.245 (0.829-1.870) 0.290
CA199 (U/ml)
≤37 vs. >37 1.051 (0.659-1.678) 0.834
AFU (U/L)
≤30.8 vs. >30.8 0.601 (0.367-0.984) 0.043 0.438 (0.264-0.728) 0.001

Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, cancer antigen 19-9; AFU, alpha-l-fucosidase.