Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 6;126(5):693–726. doi: 10.1037/rev0000151

Table 2. Use of Internal Computational Parameters to Predict Developmental Outcomes (Persisting Delay, Resolving Delay) in a Polygenic Model of Language Delay.

Computational parameter Processing role Effect size of PD versus RD comparison
Note. PD = persisting delay; RD = resolving delay. Scores show ηp2 effect sizes from ANOVA comparing PD and RD groups (see Thomas & Knowland, 2014, Table 2, for parallel analyses using logistic regression methods).
* Effect reliable at p < .05. ** Effect reliable at p < .01.
Number of internal units Capacity .031**
Pruning threshold Capacity/Regressive events .021*
Learning algorithm Capacity/Plasticity .104**
Lexical-semantic learning rate Plasticity .024**
Unit discriminability Plasticity/Signal .025**
Processing noise Signal .026**