Mojibian 2015.
Methods | Unblinded randomised clinical trial | |
Participants | Pregnant women with GA 12‐16 weeks who had serum 25(OH) D less than 30 ng/mL. Women with a history of diabetes or participants who consumed vitamin D supplements during the previous 6 months and women with thyroid or parathyroid disorders were deemed not eligible. | |
Interventions | Women randomised to: Group 1 (n = 250): 50,000 IU vitamin D every 2 weeks orally; Group 2 (n = 250): 400 IU vitamin D daily. Health worker cadre: women were recruited from 2 prenatal clinics (Shahid and Mojibian hospitals) in Yazd, Iran (north of tropics). The study was conducted in 2 prenatal clinics; researchers obtained general information, including maternal age, height, prepregnancy weight, level of education, reproductive and medical histories, and prepregnancy BMI. Assessment of primary outcome, such as gestational diabetes was done by 100 gr oral glucose tolerance test between 24‐28 weeks. The participants delivered at the prenatal clinics (Shahid Sadoughi and Mojibian hospitals). The researchers assessed other outcomes such as serum levels of 25 (OH) D at the time of delivery from mother and cord, neonatal weight, length, head circumference and Apgar of 1 and 5 minutes, as well as other neonatal complications such as macrosomia, respiratory distress and hypoglycaemia. |
|
Outcomes |
Maternal Primary
Secondary
Infant Primary
Secondary
Laboratory method used for assessment of vitamin D concentrations: 25 (OH) D was analysed by Eliza (Euroimmun Kit, Nima Pooyesh Teb Company, Tehran, Iran) with an inter‐assay coefficient of variation of 7.8% and an intra assay coefficient of variation of 3.2% |
|
Notes | • Start of supplementation: supplementation was started in the 12th week of pregnancy • Pre‐gestational BMI (kg/m2): unknown/mixed • Supplementation scheme/regimen: daily • Skin pigmentation based on Fitzpatrick skin tone chart (Fitzpatrick 1988): not available • Latitude: north of Tropics • Season at the start of pregnancy: all year round regardless of season Source of funding: study was supported by Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences Dates of the study: between 2010‐2012 Declarations of interest among primary researchers: authors reported no conflict of interest |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated random number lists were drawn by an independent researcher. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | insufficient information to allow judgment. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants and researchers were not blinded to treatment assignment. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants and researchers were not blinded to treatment assignment. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Reasons for missing outcome data unlikely to be related to true outcome. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Protocol not available, insufficient information to allow judgment |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Protocol not available, insufficient information to allow judgment. |