Soheilykhah 2011.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial | |
Participants | Pregnant women with GA less than 12 weeks without gestational diabetes, history of PCO, BMI less than 30 kg/m2 before pregnancy, no vitamin D supplementation in the past 6 months. Exclusion criteria: women with diabetes or gestational diabetes, treated with insulin, women with thyroid or parathyroid disorders, polycystic ovary disease before pregnancy, pre‐pregnancy BMI > 30 kg/m2, and, women who received vitamin D supplementation during the prior 6 months. |
|
Interventions | Group B: 50,000 IU monthly (2000 IU daily) Group C: 50,000 IU every 2 weeks (4000 IU daily). Health worker cadre: the study was conducted in 2 prenatal clinics: Mojibian Hospital and Shahid Sadoughi Hospital) in Yazd, Iran. Latitude: 31.89 north of Tropics. Pregnant women were followed up every month during pregnancy and were evaluated regarding adverse effects of vitamin D. A blood sample for measurement of FBS, insulin, vitamin D and calcium was taken at the end of pregnancy for each participant. Specific research staff roles were not described. |
|
Outcomes |
Maternal Primary
Secondary
Laboratory method used for assessment of vitamin D concentrations: vitamin D was analysed by chemiluminescence assay with an inter‐assay coefficient of variation (CV) of 2.7% and an intra assay CV of 3.2%. |
|
Notes | • Start of supplementation: supplementation began in the 12th week of pregnancy • Pre‐gestational BMI (kg/m2): < 30 kg/m2 • Supplementation scheme/regimen: biweekly and monthly • Skin pigmentation based on Fitzpatrick skin tone chart (Fitzpatrick 1988): not available • Latitude: north of Tropics • Season at the start of pregnancy: not stated Source of funding: none disclosed. Dates of the study: 2009‐2011. Declarations of interest among primary researchers: the authors report no conflicts of interest. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | The participants were divided into 3 groups randomly. Computer‐generated random number lists were drawn up by an independent researcher. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to allow judgment. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Pregnant women and researchers were not blinded to treatment assignment. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Pregnant women and researchers were not blinded to treatment assignment. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 40 participants from group C, 38 cases from group B and 35 pregnant women from group A completed participation. Reasons for attrition were not mentioned, but group characteristics remained similar. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Authors reported that supplementation with 50,000 IU vitamin D every 2 weeks resulted in no adverse effects, such as hypercalcaemia, in pregnant women. Incidents of AE not reported for women in other intervention groups. |
Other bias | Low risk | The study appears to be free of other sources of bias. |