Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 14;97(10):4293–4297. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz261

Table 2.

Comparison of apparent ileal (AID) and total tract digestibility (ATTD), and hindgut fermentation (HF) in 2 higher energy (HE) and 2 lower energy (LE) corn samples with and without xylanase1

Diet Enzyme P-value2
Item, % HE-1 HE-2 LE-1 LE-2 + - Pooled SEM Diet Enzyme
AID
 GE 79.1 80.2 80.2 79.7 80.2 79.4 0.95 0.744 0.311
 DM 77.5 78.2 78.9 78.5 78.5 78.0 0.92 0.686 0.522
 TDF 22.0 23.6 27.3 23.8 25.8 22.6 1.40 0.100 0.043
HF 3
 GE 5.3 5.5 3.0 3.9 4.6 4.2 1.43 0.092 0.737
 DM 6.0 6.6 3.9 4.8 5.7 5.0 1.63 0.113 0.678
 TDF 10.4 10.3 7.0 6.7 8.8 8.4 1.45 0.059 0.946
ATTD
 GE 84.4b 85.7b 83.2a 83.6a 84.8 83.6 0.61 <0.001 0.008
 DM 83.5a 84.8b 82.8a 83.3a 84.2 83.0 0.63 0.007 0.011
 TDF 32.4 33.9 34.3 30.5 34.6 31.0 1.58 0.400 0.048

1Econase XT 25P was added at 100 g/tonne.

2No interactions between diet and enzyme were observed, P > 0.10.

3HF = Hindgut fermentation = (total tract digestibility – apparent ileal digestibility).