Table 3.

Effect of different emulsifier supplementation on growth performance in piglets^1,2

Items	Treatments3				SEM	P-value
	CTR	SSL	PGFE	PG-SL
BW, kg
Day 0	10.06	10.06	10.06	10.05	0.14	1.000
Day 17	16.84	18.43	17.54	17.10	0.35	0.400
Day 35	29.68	31.05	31.36	29.13	0.62	0.536
ADG, kg/d
Day 0–17	0.40b	0.49a	0.44ab	0.41ab	0.02	0.144
Day 17–35	0.71	0.70	0.77	0.67	0.02	0.300
Day 0–35	0.56	0.60	0.61	0.55	0.02	0.398
ADFI, kg/d
Day 0–17	0.79b	0.94a	0.86ab	0.81ab	0.02	0.137
Day 17–35	1.46	1.49	1.58	1.40	0.04	0.473
Day 0–35	1.14	1.22	1.23	1.12	0.03	0.477
G:F
Day 0–17	0.50	0.52	0.52	0.51	0.01	0.894
Day 17–35	0.49	0.47	0.49	0.48	0.01	0.745
Day 0–35	0.49	0.49	0.50	0.49	0.01	0.947

¹G:F = Gain: feed.

² n = 7 pigs per treatment.

³CTR = basal diet; SSL = basal diet + 0.1% SSL; PGFE = basal diet + PGFE; PG-SL = basal diet + 0.08% PGFE + 0.02% SSL.

^a,bMean values within a row without a common superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05).