. 2019 Aug 20;97(10):4235–4241. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz276

Table 4.

Effect of different emulsifier supplementation on nutrient digestibility in piglets^1,2

Items	Treatments³				SEM	P-value
Items	CTR	SSL	PGFE	PG-SL	SEM	P-value
Day 14–16
DM, %	85.71^b	89.34^a	90.75^a	89.99^a	0.71	0.021
CP, %	78.93^b	85.08^a	85.57^a	85.97^a	1.13	0.055
EE, %	55.56^b	67.61^a	71.70^a	69.68^a	2.49	0.014
Energy, %	85.42^b	90.32^a	90.71^a	89.79^a	0.74	0.021
Ca, %	52.84^b	71.10^a	72.57^a	69.27^a	2.92	0.010
P %	61.63^b	72.55^a	76.95^a	72.79^a	1.92	0.004
Day 31–33
DM, %	89.00	90.60	90.61	89.51	0.37	0.343
CP, %	84.89	88.06	87.96	86.46	0.66	0.244
EE, %	62.43	64.44	66.34	67.26	1.57	0.745
Energy, %	89.21	90.70	90.63	89.22	0.40	0.391
Ca, %	67.60	71.84	72.15	72.90	1.28	0.449
P, %	62.66	66.97	68.26	66.21	1.23	0.422

¹EE = ether extract, Ca = calcium, P = phosphorus.

² n = 4 pigs per treatment.

³CTR = basal diet; SSL = basal diet + 0.1% SSL; PGFE = basal diet + PGFE; PG-SL = basal diet + 0.08% PGFE + 0.02% SSL.

^a,bMean values within a row without a common superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05).