Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 3;97(10):4023–4031. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz256

Table 2.

Chemical analysis of experimental diets (as-fed-basis)1

STTD P, % of NRC (2012)2–5
Item 80 90 100 115 130 150
Total calcium (Ca), %
Phase 1 0.74 0.74 0.76 0.79 0.73 0.91
Phase 2 0.51 0.55 0.59 0.74 0.91 0.84
Phase 3 0.58 0.54 0.57 0.59 1.11 0.84
Phase 4 0.53 0.58 0.85 0.89 0.67 0.69
Total phosphorus (P), %
Phase 1 0.40 0.43 0.47 0.49 0.56 0.62
Phase 2 0.31 0.43 0.48 0.49 0.57 0.57
Phase 3 0.33 0.36 0.36 0.44 0.46 0.57
Phase 4 0.31 0.39 0.48 0.53 0.54 0.58

1Representative samples of treatment diets were taken from 6 feeders per dietary treatment 3 d after the beginning and 3 d before the end of the phase and stored at −20 °C. After blending, subsamples were submitted to Ward Laboratories, Inc. (Kearney, NE) for analyses.

2Phase 1 calculated STTD P were 0.25%, 0.28%, 0.31%, 0.36%, 0.40%, and 0.46%, and calculated total P were 0.49%, 0.52%, 0.56%, 0.61%, 0.66%, and 0.73% for 80%, 90%, 100%, 115%, 130%, and 150% of the NRC (2012) estimate, respectively.

3Phase 2 calculated STTD P were 0.22%, 0.24%, 0.27%, 0.31%, 0.35%, and 0.40%, and calculated total P were 0.44%, 0.46%, 0.49%, 0.54%, 0.59%, and 0.65% for 80%, 90%, 100%, 115%, 130%, and 150% of the NRC (2012) estimate, respectively.

4Phase 3 calculated STTD P were 0.19%, 0.22%, 0.24%, 0.28%, 0.31%, and 0.36%, and calculated total P were 0.40%, 0.42%, 0.45%, 0.49%, 0.53%, and 0.59 % for 80%, 90%, 100%, 115%, 130%, and 150% of the NRC (2012) estimate, respectively.

5Phase 4 calculated STTD P were 0.17%, 0.19%, 0.21%, 0.24%, 0.27%, and 0.31%, and calculated total P were 0.37%, 0.39%, 0.42%, 0.45%, 0.49%, and 0.53% for 80%, 90%, 100%, 115%, 130%, and 150% of the NRC (2012) estimate, respectively.