Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Chem B. 2019 Sep 20;123(39):8168–8177. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b05168

Table 1:

Melting temperatures (in K) and binding free energy contributions (in kcal/mol, calculated for T = 295 K) derived from UV-monitored melting experiments and MD simulations.

Observable PNA1-PNA2 PNA1-RNA2 RNA1-RNA2
from thermal melting experiments
Tm [K] 347.0 (0.6) 332.8 (0.3) 314.6 (0.6)
ΔGUV [kcal/mol] −21.8 (1.0) −17.1 (0.9) −13.3 (0.5)
ΔHUV [kcal/mol] −92.6 (5.7) −80.8 (7.7) −86.3 (4.2)
TΔSUV [kcal/mol] −70.8 (4.8) −63.7 (6.9) −73.0 (3.8)
experimental data extrapolated to MD simulation concentrations
csim [mM] 5 6 7
Tm (Eq. 3) [K] 368.4 356.2 334.3
ΔG (Eq. 4) [kcal/mol] −26.0 −21.4 −17.7
from MD simulations
TmG = 0) [K] 418.4 (2.0) 365.4 (10.0) 331.1 (3.7)
ΔGcalc [kcal/mol] −44.8 (1.1) −32.0 (5.6) −17.1 (2.0)
ΔGGBGSASA + ΔGelec [kcal/mol] −28.6 (0.6) −19.0 (1.6) 17.6 (2.8)
ΔGvdW [kcal/mol] −56.7 (0.1) −56.9 (0.7) −58.2 (1.9)
TΔS [kcal/mol] −40.7 (1.5) −44.7 (4.3) −24.4 (2.5)

Values in parentheses represent standard errors of the mean. For ΔGcalc calculations and its contributions see Methods. ΔGvdW reflects the Lennard-Jones energy term. Energy errors from MD simulations were calculated at 295 K. Errors in the Tm estimates from simulation were obtained by applying the uncertainty in ΔGcalc when estimating Tm from the exponential fit.