Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 8;1(1):fcz006. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcz006

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics and scanning modalities of studies of Parkinson’s dementia (PDD) versus Parkinson’s without cognitive involvement (PD)

First author Modality N N Age Age PD MMSE PDD MMSE PD H&Y PDD H&Y PD UPDRS PDD UPDRS PD
PDD PD PDD
Total n = 175 Total n = 210
(1) Beyerb,c VBM 16 20 73.5 72.5 19.4 28.2 3 2.4
(2) Burtonb VBM 26 31 72.3 75.2 18.9 26.4 36.4 25.8
(3) Geec VBM 23 10 71.6 69.4 27.3 28.9 14.4 15.3
(4) Goldmanb VBM 24 26
(5) Kleinc FDG-PET 8 9 62 67 21 28.4 2 3 24 25
(6) Leeb VBM 16 16 69.9 68.3 19.6 27.3 2.6 1.7
(7) Nagano-Saitob,c VBM 9 17 67.3 65.4 16.1 27.9 3.3 3.1
(8) Songb VBM 18 23 72 69.1 18.1 28.6 32.1 16.9
(9) Tangb,c FDG-PET 10 30 61.4 61.9 23.2 28.5 2.5 1.8 30.7 23
(10) Xia VBM 12 12 69.3 65.6 23.4 28.1 3 1.8 44 14.3
(11) Yongb FDG-PET 13 16 73.4 64.2 15.4 27.3 3.2 2.1
Summary (mean(SD)) 16 (6) 19 (8) 69.3 (4) 67.8 (4) 20.2 (4)a 28.0 (0.8)a 2.8 (0.5) 2.3 (0.6) 30.3 (10) 20.1 (5)
a

Wilcox test shows significant difference between groups (Other comparisons are not significantly different).

b

Indicates established criteria were used to define PD dementia. Extended neuropsychological testing was used in the remaining studies.

c

Indicates the study matched PDD and PD groups for motor stage.

FDG-PET, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; H&Y, Hoehn and Yahr; MMSE, mini-mental state examination; PDD, Parkinson’s disease dementia; SPECT, single photon emission computed tomography; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale score (part III, motor); VBM, voxel-based morphometry.