Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 4.
Published in final edited form as: World J Urol. 2016 Jun 24;35(3):367–378. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1885-4

Table 1.

Select clinical trials with reported outcomes

Phase n % UCB % UTUC Arm A Arm B Median survival (A vs. B; months) p value Notes Reference

First-line therapy for cisplatin-eligible patients
 II 133 75 17 MVAC - 13.3 - [3]
 III 269 87 NR MVAC Cisplatin 12.5 versus 8.2 0.002 [4]
 III 263 85 13 DD-MVAC + G-CSF MVAC 15.1 versus 14.9 5-year survival was significantly higher with DD-MVAC + G-CSF at 21.8 versus 13.5 % with MVAC. [5,6]
 III 405 100 0 GC MVAC 13.8 versus 14.8 0.75 [7]
 III 85 NR NR Paclitaxel + carboplatin MVAC 13.8 versus 15.4 0.65 [8]
 III 220 84 16 Docetaxel + cisplatin DD-MVAC + G-CSF 9.3 versus 14.2 0.026 Survival difference was nonsignificant after adjusting for prognostic factors (p = 0.089). [9]
 III 130 83 13 Dose-dense GC + G-CSF DD-MVAC + G-CSF 18.0 versus 19.0 0.98 [10]
 III 626 82 13 PGC GC 15.8 versus 12.7 0.075 [11]
 II 63 83 18 Sunitinib + GC - 12 - [12]
 II 98 70 30 Sorafenib + GC Placebo + GC 11.3 versus 10.6 0.66 [13]
First-line therapy for cisplatin-ineligible patients
 II/III 238 74 22 Carbo/gem M-CAVI 9.3 versus 8.1 0.64 Criteria: (1) GFR < 60 but > 30 ml/mi; and/or (2) PS of 2.
Severe acute toxicity was 9.3 % in GC versus 21.2 % in M-CAVI.
[16]
 II 51 61 39 Bevacizumab + carbo/gem 13.9 Criteria: (1) KPS 60–70 %; (2) CrCl < 60 ml/min; (3) visceral metastasis; and/or (4) solitary kidney. [17]
 I/II 32 100 0 Split-dose cisplatin (day 1 and 8) + gemcitabine (21-day cycle) - 16 - Criteria: (1) WHO PS 0–2 and (b) GFR > 40 ml/min. [18]
 - 38 97 0 Split-dose cisplatin (day 1 and 15) + gemcitabine (28-day cycle) - 8.5 - Criterion: CrCl between 35 and 59 ml/min. [19]
 II 69 52 46 Vinfìunine + gemcitabine Vinfìunine + carboplatin 14.0 versus 12.8 0.86 Criteria: (1) ECOG PS 0 or 1 and (2) cisplatin-ineligible. defined as calculated CrCl < 60 but ≥ 30 mL/min and/or NYHA class II/III heart failure. [20]
Second-line therapy
 III 370 NR NR Vinfìunine + BSC BSC 6.9 versus 4.6 0.287 Significant after adjusting for “eligible” patients. [21]
 II 47 NR NR Pemetrexed - 9.6 - [22]
 II 31 94 6 Paclitaxel - 7.2 - [23]
 II 30 83 17 Docetaxel - 9 - [24]
 II 148 NR NR Ramucirumab + docetaxel Docetaxel 10.4 versus 9.2 0.201 Median PFS: 5.4 months with arm A versus 2.8 months with arm B (p = 0.0002).
Trial included a third arm, icru- cumab + docetaxel, which did not improve PFS.
[25]
Immunotherapy
 Ib 33 NR NR Pembrolizumab - NR - Criteria: (1) tumors on immuno- histochemistry showed ≥ 1 % PD-Ll-positive cells in tumor nests or a PD-Ll-positive band in stroma and (2) recurrent or persistent metastatic UC.
ORR was 25 %. 12-month PFS was 19%.
[38]
 Ib 44 NR NR Avelumab - NR - Studied as second-line therapy.
ORR was 15.9 % overall and 40 % in PD-Ll-positive tumors.
[39]
 II 316 74 21 Atezolizumab - 7.9 - Criteria: (1) cisplatin-ineligible and chemo-naive or (2) cisplatin- refractory.
ORR for the IC2/3, IC1/2/3, and overall cohort were 26, 18, and 15 %, respectively. Median survival for the IC2/3, IC1/2/3, and overall cohorts were 11.4, 8.8, and 7.9 months, respectively.
[34]

BSC best supportive care, Carbo/gem carboplatin plus gemcitabine, CrCl creatinine clearance, DD-MVAC dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin, G-CSF granulocyte- colony stimulating factor, GC gemcitabine plus cisplatin, GFR glomerular filtration rate, IC immune cell PD-L1 expression grade, KPS Kamofsky performance status, M-CAVI methotrexate, carboplatin, plus vinblastine, MVAC methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin, NR not reported, NYHA New York Heart Association, ORR objective response rate, PGC paclitaxel, gemcitabine plus cisplatin, PFS progression-free survival, PS performance status, UC urothelial carcinoma, UCB urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, UTUC upper tract urothelial carcinoma, WHO World Health Organization