Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 1;3(4):924–943. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00097

Table 4. .

Configurations of DC stimulation

Figure Protocol fG1 ΔV1[mV] fG2 ΔV2[mV] fG3 ΔV3[mV] Growth [s] Repetition tstim or t1[s] trelax or t2[s]
2B uni-group 10% 0.1 90% 0 750 no 150 300
2D uni-group 10% 0.1 90% 0 750 no 150 300
3A tri-group 30% 0.1 30% − 0.1 40% 0 750 no 150 300
3B bi-group 30% 0.1 70% − 0.1 750 no 150 300
4A bi-group 10%, 30%, 50%, 70% −1.2, 1.2 1 1 − fG1 − ΔV1 750 no 150 5,850
4B uni-group 10%, 30%, 50%, 70% −1.2, 1.2 1 − fG1 0 750 no 150 5,850
4C tri-group 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% −1.2, 1.2 fG1 − ΔV1 1 − fG1fG2 0 750 no 150 5,850
4I all 50% −1.2, 1.2 50% −1.2, 1.2 750 no 150 5,850
5D repetitive 10% 0.1 90% 0 750 yes2 multiple3
5E repetitive 10% multiple4 90% 0 750 80 75 150
6-on-off repetitive 10% 0.1 90% 0 750 3 150 150
6-alternating1 repetitive 10% ± 0.05 90% 0 750 3 150 150
6-alternating2 repetitive 10% ±0.1 90% 0 750 3 150 150
1

The stimulation intensities are − 1.2, − 0.8, − 0.4, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2 mV

2

The repetition round (n) were matched with n×t1 = 6,000s

3

The combinations used are (75,75), (75,150), (150,75), (150,150), (150,300), (300,150) s

4

The stimulation intensities are 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 mV

All results in this study except Figure 4I and Figure 5E are averages from 30 independent simulations.