Table 1. Distribution of beauty ratings in Experiments 1A,B (N = 20 each) and Experiment 2 (N =22).
Stimulus Kind | Count without Task | % | Count with Task | % | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beauty Rating | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Experiment 1Aa | ||||||||||
Self-selected beautiful | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 90 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 40 |
High-valence IAPS | 0 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 80 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 3 | 15 |
Mid-valence IAPS | 0 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 20 |
Neutral IKEA | 8 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Candy | 4 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 30 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 30 |
Experiment 1Ba | ||||||||||
Self-selected beautiful | 0 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 55 |
High-valence IAPS | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 50 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 5 | 25 |
Mid-valence IAPS | 6 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
Neutral IKEA | 9 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Candy | 5 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 35 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 5 |
Teddy bear | 2 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 |
Experiment 2b | ||||||||||
Self-selected beautiful | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 100 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 77 |
High-valence IAPS | 1 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 41 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 36 |
Mid-valence IAPS | 4 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 23 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 18 |
Neutral IKEA | 9 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Candy | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 45 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 23 |
For each stimulus, category is with or without an added task. Beauty ratings: “definitely not” (B = 0); “perhaps no” (1); perhaps yes (2); “definitely yes” (3). The teddy bear was used only in experiment 1B.
See also Figure S4.
N = 20 each.
N = 22.