Table 2.
Cluster rating averages and ranks for CBSST implementation on ACT teamsa
| Importance for initial CBSST implementation | Changeability of implementation factor | Importance for sustainability | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thematic cluster (# in Fig. 1) | Cluster ratingb | Cluster rank | Cluster ratingb | Cluster rank | Cluster ratingb | Cluster rank | Rank score |
| Training support (#11) | 5.29 | 1 | 4.68 | 1 | 5.15 | 3 | 5 |
| Multi-level agency leadership (#13) | 5.25 | 2 | 4.56 | 3 | 5.26 | 2 | 7 |
| Benefits of CBSST (#7) | 5.21 | 3 | 4.49 | 4 | 5.38 | 1 | 8 |
| CBSST & ACT synergy (#5) | 4.83 | 9 | 4.57 | 2 | 5.06 | 5 | 16 |
| Provider perceptions about CBSST (#3) | 4.97 | 7 | 4.34 | 6 | 5.10 | 4 | 17 |
| Provider characteristics (#14) | 5.04 | 5 | 4.28 | 8 | 4.89 | 8 | 21 |
| Training resources (#12) | 5.02 | 6 | 4.43 | 5 | 4.78 | 10 | 21 |
| Coordination/interaction among ACT providers (#8) | 4.93 | 8 | 4.32 | 7 | 4.96 | 7 | 22 |
| Staff pressures/other demands (#4) | 5.12 | 4 | 3.31 | 14 | 4.98 | 6 | 24 |
| CBSST fit with ACT process (#2) | 4.79 | 10 | 4.03 | 10 | 4.87 | 9 | 29 |
| Client characteristics (#6) | 4.78 | 11 | 3.79 | 11 | 4.72 | 11 | 33 |
| Integration of CBSST into ACT (#10) | 4.73 | 12 | 4.05 | 9 | 4.68 | 12 | 33 |
| Fit with ACT structure (#1) | 4.63 | 13 | 3.40 | 13 | 4.59 | 13 | 39 |
| Gov./regulatory factors (#9) | 4.46 | 14 | 3.67 | 12 | 4.42 | 14 | 40 |
a
CBSST, cognitive behavioral social skills training; ACT, assertive community treatment
b
Cluster ratings ranged from 0 to 7, with higher scores indicating more importance for initial implementation or sustainment or easier changeability