Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hear Res. 2019 Aug 27;382:107795. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.107795

Figure 1: Audiometric and perceptual results.

Figure 1:

(A) Audiograms for listeners with normal hearing (NH) and hearing loss (HL) pooled across ears. Hearing was ~10 dB better in NH vs. HL listeners. (B) Behavioral accuracy for detecting infrequent /ta/ tokens in clear and noise-degraded conditions. Noise-related declines in behavioral performance were prominent but no group differences were observed. (C) Reaction times (RTs) for speech detection were similar between groups and speech SNRs. (D) HL listeners showed more variability and marginally poorer QuickSIN performance than NH listeners. errorbars = ± s.e.m., *p< 0.05.