Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 26;38(10):1829–1836. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03616-w

Table 2.

Evaluation of positive BSI-PCR results in 196 critically ill patients with presumed sepsis

Pathogen or target Primary analysisa Discrepancy analysisb
True positive False positive True positive range False positive range
(n) n (PPV) (95% CI) n (FPP) (95% CI) n (PPV) n (FPP)
A. Species-specific PCRs
  E. faecalis (16) 7 (44%) (20–70) 9 (3%) (1–5) 11–12 (69–75%) 4–5 (1–2%)
  E. faecium (11) 9 (82%) (48–98) 2 (1%) (0–2) 10 (91%) 1 (0%)
  S. aureus (34) 15 (44%) (27–62) 19 (6%) (4–9) 15–18 (44–53%) 16–19 (5–6%)
  S. pneumoniae (17) 12 (71%) (44–90) 5 (2%) (1–4) 13 (76%) 4 (1%)
  A. baumannii (1) 0 1 (0%) (0–2) 0–1 (0–100%) 0–1 (0–0%)
  E. coli (58) 33 (57%) (43–70) 25 (8%) (5–11) 45–46 (78–79%) 12–13 (4–4%)
  Klebsiella (11) 7 (64%) (31–90) 4 (1%) (0–3) 9–10 (82–91%) 1–2 (0–1%)
  P. aeruginosa (32) 5 (16%) (5–33) 27 (8%) (6–12) 5–7 (16–22%) 25–27 (8–8%)
  C. albicans (0)
  C. glabrata (0)
  C. krusei (0)
  Total A. (180) 88 (49%) (41–56%) 92 (3%) (2–3%) 108–117 (60–65%) 63–72 (2–2%)
B. Generic PCRs
  Enterococcus (25) 12 (48%) (28–69) 13 (4%) (2–7) 16–17 (64–68%) 8–9 (2–3%)
  Staphylococcus (24) 11 (46%) (26–67) 13 (4%) (2–7) 12 (50%) 12 (4%)
  Gram-positive (30) 25 (83%) (65–94) 5 (2%) (1–4) 30 (100%) 0
  Gram-negative (33) 30 (91%) (76–98) 3 (1%) (0–3) 33 (100%) 0
  3Candida (2) 1 (50%) (1–99) 1 (0%) (0–2) 2 (100%) 0
  Pan-Aspergillus (1) 0 1 (0%) (0–2) 0 1 (0%)
  Total B. (115) 79 (69%) (59–77) 36 (2%) (1–3) 93–94 (81–82%) 21–22 (1–1%)
Total (295) 167 (57%) (51–62) 128 (2%) (2–3) 201–211 (68–72%) 84–94 (2–2%)

n, number of positive BSI-PCR results (multiple positive results possible per patient); CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value (= true positive/(true positive + false positive)); FPP, false positive proportion (= false positive/total number performed (n = 325 per PCR))

aFor the primary analysis positive BSI-PCR results were compared with the reference pathogens based on a prospective registration of most likely causative pathogen(s) within the MARS study

bFor the discrepancy analysis, false positive BSI-PCR results based on the primary analysis were adjudicated by an expert panel. Since 10 results were classified as “undetermined” by the panelists, a range was calculated for the PPV and FPP by classifying the undetermined results firstly as false positive and subsequently as true positive