Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Paediatr Drugs. 2019 Apr;21(2):59–70. doi: 10.1007/s40272-018-00324-4

Table 1.

Assessment Tools for Pediatric Neuropathic Pain

Tool Proposed Target Population Advantages/Disadvantages
I. Screening Tools
 1. Pediatric-modified
Total Neuropathy Score
3 sets of symptom questions
5 physical examination signs
Children aged 5–18 years with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy Good reliability and internal consistency
Good for screening and assessment
Not as sensitive to change over time
Clinical significance of scores is unclear
II. Assessment Tools
 2. Adolescent
Pediatric Pain Tool
Body outline
Word graphic rating scale
List of 67 symptom descriptors
Children aged 8–17 years with acute pain (hospitalized or not) Good validity, reliable in a variety of pain conditions Quickly completed Multidimensional approach to pain
Not well studied in chronic or complex pain
 3. Pediatric Pain
Questionnaire
10-cm Visual
Analog Scale
46 symptom descriptors
Pain location
Children aged 5–18 years Primarily used in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and sickle-cell anemia Derived from the well-studied McGill Pain Questionnaire Well-established evidence of validity
Takes 15 min to complete
 4. Abu-Saad Pediatric
Pain Assessment
Tool
10-cm Visual
Analog Scale
32 symptom descriptors
Children aged 5–17 years with disease-related pain or undergoing surgery Assesses multiple aspects of pain, including triggers and medication type/amount
Good internal consistency Less supportive evidence than for other tools
*

Reproduced with permission from [34] - The assessment tools were validated for pain in children; they may be helpful for NP because they assess the pain characteristics