Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 7;14(10):e0222762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222762

Table 2. Patients with at least one CV or bleeding event, by treatment group (VKA: VKA Group—NOAC: NOAC Group).

Group VKA NOAC Switch
N of patients 1355 577 239
VKA+NOAC Started with VKA Proceed with NOAC
Effectiveness end-point: CV events
N (%) 198 (14.6%) 57 (9.9%) 43 (18.0%) 32 (13.4%) 14 (5.9%)
P-value¥ - 0.0049* 0.1788 0.6197 0.0002*
Hazard ratio [95% CI] for comparison vs. VKA alone 1.0 0.9 [0.6–1.2] 1.1 [0.8–1.5] 1.2 [0.8–1.8] 0.5 [0.8–1.5]
P-value from Cox proportional hazards model for comparison vs. VKA alone - 0.3425 0.5481 0.2773 0.0255
Safety end-point: bleeding
N (%) 154 (11.4%) 32 (5.5%) 26 (10.9%) 17 (7.1%) 10 (4.2%)
P-value¥ - <0.0001* 0.8265 0.0502 0.0008*
Hazard ratio [95% CI] for comparison vs. VKA alone 1.0 0.6 [0.4–0.9] 0.8 [0.5–1.4] 0.8 [0.5–1.4] 0.5 [0.3–1.0]
P-value from Cox proportional hazards model for comparison vs. VKA alone - 0.0230 0.3612 0.5084 0.0419

¥ Pair-wise P-value for comparison vs. VKA

*Statistically significant i.e. p<0,05