Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 7.
Published before final editing as: J Res Adolesc. 2019 Apr 7:10.1111/jora.12500. doi: 10.1111/jora.12500

Table 2.

Neural regions that differed across age during correct responses in the alone compared to the maternal presence condition, separately for appetitive and aversive social stimuli

Anatomical Region x y z t k
Appetitive mom > alone
vmPFC 3 29 ⎼23 3.65 81
dACC ⎼15 11 40 5.20 2992a
R Middle Frontal Gyrus 30 ⎼4 61 6.02 a
L Precentral Gyrus ⎼33 ⎼7 58 5.29 a
R Fusiform Gyrus 24 ⎼7 ⎼38 4.09 119b
R Temporal Pole 39 14 ⎼32 3.22 b
R Cerebellum (VIII) 3 ⎼76 ⎼41 3.94 325c
L Cerebellum (IX) ⎼12 ⎼61 ⎼41 3.88 c
Aversive mom > alone
R Calcarine Gyrus 18 ⎼73 22 3.75 329d
R Cuneus ⎼12 ⎼70 34 3.48 d
PPI (amygdala seed): Appetitive mom > alone
mPFC ⎼12 41 7 3.65 22
R Inferior Parietal Lobule 42 ⎼58 49 3.77 75

Note: L and R refer to left and right hemispheres; k refers to the number of voxels in each significant cluster; t refers to peak activation level in each cluster; and x, y, and z refer to MNI coordinates. Regions that share the same superscript are part of the same cluster. The mPFC was small volume corrected, which yielded a minimum cluster size of 20 for neural activation and 18 for coactivation (PPI). All other regions were based on a whole-brain mask, which yielded a minimum cluster size of 116 voxels for neural activation and 74 voxels for coactivation (PPI). All regions are significant at p < .005.