Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 8;2019(10):CD001408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001408.pub2

Comparison 3. BoNT‐A versus serial casting.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Gait: observational gait analysis (PRS scores); short‐term follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2 Gait: observational gait analysis (PRS scores); medium‐term follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3 Gait: observational gait analysis (PRS scores); long‐term follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4 Gait: kinematics; short‐term follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 Ankle dorsiflexion at initial contact 1 21 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.90 [‐2.90, 8.70]
4.2 Peak ankle dorsiflexion in stance 1 21 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.60 [‐5.78, 4.58]
5 Gait: kinematics; medium‐term follow‐up 3   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
5.1 Ankle dorsiflexion at initial contact 2 47 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 6.59 [1.39, 11.78]
5.2 Peak ankle dorsiflexion in stance 3 83 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.03 [‐3.56, 9.62]
5.3 Peak ankle dorsiflexion in swing 2 62 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.11 [‐4.17, 4.38]
6 Gait: kinematics; long‐term follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
6.1 Ankle dorsiflexion at initial contact 1 26 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.60 [‐6.37, 5.17]
6.2 Peak ankle dorsiflexion in stance 1 26 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐2.0 [‐8.50, 4.50]
6.3 Peak ankle dorsiflexion in swing 1 26 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.70 [‐0.80, 8.20]
7 Gait: speed; medium‐term follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
8 Gait: speed; long‐term follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
9 Function; medium‐term follow‐up 2 41 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.64 [‐1.55, 8.82]
10 Function (GMFM goal scores); short‐term follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
11 Function (GMFM goal scores); long‐term follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
12 Range of motion: passive ankle dorsiflexion; short‐term follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
13 Range of motion: passive ankle dorsiflexion; medium‐term follow‐up 3 93 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.82 [‐2.26, 5.91]
14 Range of motion: passive ankle dorsiflexion; long‐term follow‐up 2 57 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.02 [‐5.63, 3.58]
15 Spasticity: ankle plantarflexors; short‐term follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
16 Spasticity: ankle plantarflexors; medium‐term follow‐up 3 93 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.13 [‐0.25, 0.52]
17 Spasticity: ankle plantarflexors; long‐term follow‐up 2 57 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.17 [‐0.34, 0.67]
18 Adverse events 3 64 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.59 [0.03, 11.03]
19 Sensitivity analyses: gait: kinematics (ankle dorsiflexion in stance) 3   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
19.1 Short‐term follow‐up 1 21 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.60 [‐5.78, 4.58]
19.2 Medium‐term follow‐up 2 62 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.12 [‐4.56, 4.81]
19.3 Long‐term follow‐up 1 26 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐2.0 [‐8.50, 4.50]