Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 8;2019(10):CD001408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001408.pub2

Ackman 2005.

Methods Method of randomisation: a block design randomisation sequence was used, in a way that each child enrolled in any centre was randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 groups. Randomisation stratified by topographic pattern of CP.
Blinding: the evaluating clinician, parents, and children were blinded. The physician or site co‐ordinator was aware of the group to which the child had been randomised.
Intention‐to‐treat analysis: yes
Loss of follow‐up: 5 children
  • 3 BoNT‐A only group

  • 1 placebo/cast group

  • 1 BoNT‐A/cast group


Unit of analysis: child
Participants Place: 5 centres in the USA
Period of study: not described
Number assigned: 39
Number assessed: 34
  • 9 BoNT‐A only group

  • 13 placebo/cast group

  • 12 BoNT‐A/cast group


Inclusion criteria:
  • Spastic hemiplegic or diplegic CP

  • Aged 3 to 10 years

  • Independent ambulators without assistive devices

  • Functional equinus

  • Neutral ankle position with full knee extension


Exclusion criteria:
  • Previous surgery to tendo‐achilles or subtalar joint

  • No BoNT‐A injections in previous 6 months

  • Hip or knee flexion contractures > 10°


Age:
  • BoNT‐A‐only group (mean (range)): 69 (40 to 105) months

  • Placebo/cast group (mean (range)): 68 (36 to 108) months

  • BoNT‐A/cast group (mean (range)): 72 (41 to 99) months


Gender:
  • BoNT‐A‐only group: 6 males; 6 females

  • Placebo/cast group: 6 males; 8 females

  • BoNT‐A/cast group: 6 males; 7 females


Motor distribution:
  • BoNT‐A‐only group: 4 diplegia; 8 hemiplegia

  • Placebo/cast group: 4 diplegia; 10 hemiplegia

  • BoNT‐A/cast group: 5 diplegia; 8 hemiplegia


GMFCS:
  • BoNT‐A‐only group: 11 level I; 1 level II

  • Placebo/cast group: 14 level I; 0 level II

  • BoNT‐A/cast group: 12 level I; 1 level II

Interventions All children received a total of 3 treatments, at baseline and 3 and 6 months.
BoNT‐A‐only group:
  • 3 BoNT‐A (brand not described) injections into medial and lateral heads of gastrocnemius (dose 4 U/kg to each muscle)

  • Day and night AFOs were recommended


Placebo/cast group:
  • 3 placebo injections

  • Cast(s) applied at each clinical visit, remained on for 3 weeks

  • After cast removal, day and night AFOs were recommended


BoNT‐A/cast group:
  • 3 BoNT‐A injections (brand not described) into medial and lateral heads of gastrocnemius (dose 4 U/kg to each muscle)

  • Cast(s) applied at each clinical visit, remained on for 3 weeks

  • After cast removal, day and night AFOs were recommended

Outcomes Length of follow‐up:
  • Follow‐up of 12 months

  • Assessments at baseline, 3, 6, 7.5, and 12 months


Primary outcomes:
  • Velocity and stride length

  • Ankle kinematics

    • Ankle dorsiflexion at initial contact

    • Peak dorsiflexion in stance

    • Peak dorsiflexion in swing


Secondary outcomes:
  • Spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale and Tardieu)

  • Passive and active ankle dorsiflexion

  • Ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion strength

  • Ankle power generation

Notes Comments:
  1. The initial power calculations determined the need for 25 children in each group. However, even though 90 children met the inclusion criteria, the authors reported a refusal rate higher than 50%.

  2. For the purposes of this review, we decided to include only the isolated BoNT‐A and placebo/cast groups. This was done in order to comply with our protocol, which established that studies where both intervention groups received BoNT‐A injections would be excluded.

  3. The authors kindly provided raw data tables from the study upon our request.


Source of funding: funded by an unrestricted educational grant by Allergan Inc.
Conflicts of interest: not reported, but the grant mentioned above could be considered as a possible conflict of interest.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Comment: not described clearly, but the block sequence is likely to have been computer generated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: not described clearly, but the study authors state that the randomisation list was provided only to the individual responsible for co‐ordinating the injection procedure
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: evaluating clinicians and parents were not aware whether children received BoNT‐A or placebo injections. The study authors state that parents of children in the BoNT‐A‐only group were instructed not to discuss the treatment with the assessing clinician.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: individuals responsible for data analysis were blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: no missing outcome data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: the study protocol was not available. The relevant outcomes seem to have been reported.
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: the initial power calculations determined the need for 25 children in each group. However, even though 90 children met the inclusion criteria, the authors reported a refusal rate higher than 50%.