Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 30;9(9):111. doi: 10.3390/membranes9090111

Table 14.

Characteristics and performance of TFC and GO-functionalized TFC membranes from different studies by Ali, et al., Huang et al., and Chae et al. [287,290,292].

Membrane Contact Angle (°) Average Surface Roughness (nm) Zeta Potential (mV) Thickness of Active Membrane Layer (nm) Permeability (l/m2-h/bar) * Rejection (%) *
TFC 1 75 84 −21 340 0.58 99.2
GO 2 55 75 −38 270 0.97 99.3
GO 3 50 68 −42 250 1.1 99.4
GO 4 48 60 −44 245 0.99 99.5
TFC 5 64 NA NA 4560 1.4 98.5
GO 6 55 NA NA 1930 1.9 98
GO 7 52 NA NA 4060 1.7 94.5
TFC 8 85 44 NA NA 2.4 94.1
AGO 9 45 29 NA NA 2.3 95.3

NA not available; TFC 1: virgin TFC membrane (origin and type not provided) [292]; GO 2: GO-imbedded polyamide via 15 ppm GO in MPD solution [292]; GO 3: GO imbedded polyamide via 38 ppm GO in MPD solution [292]; GO 4: GO imbedded polyamide via 76 ppm GO in MPD solution [292]; TFC 5: hand prepared TFC brackish water membrane [287]; GO 6: GO imbedded polyamide via 100 ppm GO in MPD solution [287]; GO 7: GO imbedded polyamide via 200 ppm GO in MPD solution [287]; TFC 8: DuPont Filmtec XLE (low energy, high permeability, lower rejecting) commercial brackish water membrane [290]; AGO 9; AGO-grafted polyamide membrane [290]; 2000 ppm sodium chloride solution.