Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 28;8(9):1324. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091324

Table 2.

Definition of dyspepsia and symptom assessment.

Studies Definition of Dyspepsia Duration of Dyspepsia Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment Quality of Life Assessment Treatment Success H. pylori Test Post-Eradication Test Allowance for Medication
McColl, 1998 [9] Intermittent or persistent pain or discomfort in the upper abdomen, heartburn, nausea, a feeling of postprandial fullness, or any other symptoms thought to be related to the upper GI tract 4 Mo GDSS SF-36 A score of 0 or 1 on the GDSS UBT, CLO, Histology UBT The patients could take any medication necessary, including PPI
Blum, 1998 [10] Dyspeptic symptoms (specifically, pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen) that had been present for at least six months 6 Mo Mean symptom score by Likert score GSRS, Psychological General Well-Being Index No symptoms or no more than minimal pain or discomfort (a score of 0 or 1) centered in the upper abdomen during any of the 7 days preceding the 12 month visit UBT, CLO, Histology UBT, CLO, Histology Not specified
Talley, 1999 [11] Moderate pain of discomfort centered in the upper abdomen as their predominant symptom for a minimum of three days in the week 3 Mo GSRS SF-36 No more than mild pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen (a score of 0 or 1) during the 7 days before the final visit UBT UBT, Histology Antacid was dispensed at each visit
Talley, 1999 (ORCHID) [12] Pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen 3 Mo Dyspeptic symptoms using validated Likert scale (0–4) GSRSPsychological General Well-Being Index No more than minimal dyspeptic symptoms during any of the 7 days before the 12 month visit UBT, CLO, Histology UBT, Histology Patients could receive treatment for dyspeptic symptoms from their doctor, but all drugs used were recorded
Varannes, 2001 [13] Intermittent or persistent epigastric pain for at least 3 months with a severity score of 3 or more on a 5-point Likert scale 3 Mo Likert scale (0–4) SF-36 A decrease of at least 2 points on the Likert scale between randomization and the 12 month follow-up CLO, Histology UBT Rescue symptomatic medications could be prescribed from day 8 until the end of the study, provided they were not anti-secretory drugs or sucralfate
Koskenpato, 2001 [14] Dyspeptic symptoms 3 Mo Numeric scale questionnaire validated in a Finnish population (0–36) SF-36 Reduction of symptom score ≥ 50% CLO, Histology, Culture CLO, Histology, Culture Omeprazole 20 mg daily for the first 3 months and thereafter placebo during the follow-up
Froehlich, 2001 [15] Epigastric complaints (symptom score > 7 on a sum score ranging from 5 to 25) 10 days Validated questionnaire (5–25) SF-12 Symptom score less than 7 UBT, CLO, Histology UBT Not specified
Hsu, 2001 [16] Pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen 3 Mo Validated questionnaire (0–15) N/A Resolution of symptoms, defined as a score below 3 CLO, Histology UBT, CLO, Histology Subjects were allowed to take antacids or prokinetics (H2 blocker or PPI were forbidden) but not during the month before each interview
Malfertheiner, 2003 [17] Patients seeking medical care for dyspeptic symptom 4 wk Non-ulcer dyspepsia sum score Non-ulcer dyspepsia sum score of ≤1 CLO UBT Not specified
Zanten, 2003 [18] Rome definition: chronic or frequently recurring epigastric pain which could be associated with other upper GI symptoms 3 Mo MDSS Patients were classified as responders if they had a decrease of ≥4 points on the DSS. If patients required H2 blocker, PPI or prokinetics, they were considered as non-responders UBT, CLO, Histology UBT Patients were given aluminum hydroxide-magnesium hydroxide as a rescue antacid
Gisbert, 2004 [19] Pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen 3 Mo Five-point Likert scale N/A CLO, Histology UBT No anti-secretory therapy was allowed
Mazzoleni, 2006 [20] Pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen 3 Mo PADYQ (0–44) N/A The proportion of patients presenting a decrease of 50% or more in dyspeptic scores at 12 months compared with the baseline score CLO, Histology CLO, Histology During the study, patients were allowed to use H2 blocker and/or prokinetics to treat dyspeptic symptoms
Ang, 2006 [21] Pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen 3 Mo GDSS N/A The resolution of symptoms, defined as a score of 0 or 1 on the GDSS at 1 year UBT, CLO UBT, CLO Not specified
Gwee, 2009 [22] Rome II criteria 3 Mo Dyspepsia score (0–15) General Health Questionnaire Symptom resolution was defined as a dyspepsia score of 0 or 1 at the 12 month UBT UBT H2 blocker, antacids, prokinetics were allowed
Mazzoleni, 2011 [23] Rome III criteria 3 Mo PADYQ (0–44) N/A Proportion of patients with at least a 50% decrease in the dyspeptic symptoms score at 12 months compared with their baseline score. CLO, Histology CLO, Histology H2 blockers and prokinetics were allowed
Xu, 2013 [24] Rome III criteria 3 Mo GSRS N/A Improvement more than 50% by symptom score CLO, Histology UBT Talcid and domperidone were allowed for control group
Sodhi, 2013 [25] Rome II criteria 3 Mo 7-points Likert scales N/A Patients who reported no more than minimal dyspeptic symptoms (0 or 1) during any of the 7 days before each visit CLO, Histology CLO, Histology
Yazdanbod, 2015 [26] Rome III criteria 3 Mo GDSS (0–20) N/A Presence of no more than mild pain or discomfort (a score of 0 or 1) CLO, Histology UBT

CLO, Campylobacter-like organism test; GDSS, Glasgow dyspepsia severity score; GSRS, gastrointestinal symptom rating scale; H2, histamine 2; H. pylori, Helicobacter pylori; Mo, months; MDSS, mean dyspepsia summary score; PADYQ, Porto Alegre dyspeptic symptoms questionnaire; PPI, proton pump inhibitor; SF-36, 36 item medical outcomes study short-form general health survey; UBT, urea breath test; wk, weeks.