Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 3;9(9):115. doi: 10.3390/membranes9090115

Table 1.

Comparison of the separation performance of the reported membranes with this work.

Membrane P (bar) T (°C) SO2/N2 PO2 (barrer) a Ref.
1–15 wt % MgPc/PEI 12.8 25 ≈2.3–5.4 ≈0.42–0.13 GPU b [40]
1–15 wt % CoPc/PEI 12.8 25 ≈4.8–1.9 ≈0.25–1.13 GPU [40]
1 wt % cosalen/PU 1 5–35 ≈4.2–3.0 ≈4.2–13.2 [41]
20 wt % CoFPP/Nafion 1–2 25 ≈14.2–2.0 ≈2.2–0.3 [22]
SiO2–PVP–salcomine - 25–150 1.4–6.1 0.35–1.48 GPU [14]
1 wt % CoPc/Pebax-1657 2–8 25 ≈8.5–5.5 ≈1.12–0.93 GPU [13]
0.6 wt % T(p-OCH3)PPCoCl/Pebax-2533 0.35–8 18 7.6–2.2 12.2–6.3 This study

a 1 barrer = 10−10 cm3 cm cm−2 s−1 cmHg−1; b 1 GPU = 10−6 cm3 cm−2 s−1 cmHg−1 = 3.38 × 10−10 mol m−2 s−1 Pa−1.