Table 4.
Tabular representation of Bland–Altman and Pearson’s correlation analyses for strain assessment.
| Measurement | Comparison | Bias (%) | LOA (%) | Pearson’s R |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLS | CMR-FT vs. CT-FT | 3.003 | ±8.415 | 0.6860 |
| GCS GCS GCS |
CMR-FT vs. CT-FT | 0.888 | ±8.16 | 0.7067 |
| CMR-FT vs. TAG | 2.250 | ±10.31 | 0.4799 | |
| CT-FT vs. TAG | 1.468 | ±7.77 | 0.5484 |
Abbreviations: GLS: global longitudinal strain; GCS: global circumferential strain; CMR-FT: cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking; CT-FT: computed tomography feature tracking; LOA: limits of agreement; TAG: myocardial tagging.