Table 3.
Exercise-related physiological responses across the experimental groups.
Group | Resting HR | Mid-Point HR (7.5 min) | End-Point HR (15 min) |
---|---|---|---|
Experiment 1 | |||
Exercise + Learning (E + L) | 76.0 (12.9) | 117.0 (17.5) | 118.4 (16.7) |
Learning Only (L) | 76.9 (13.9) | - | - |
Exercise Only (E) | 74.7 (14.9) | 119.0 (18.8) | 119.1 (18.4) |
Control Group (C) | 75.5 (11.0) | - | - |
Experiment 2 | |||
Exercise + Learning (E + L) | 87.1 (9.9) | 145.8 (7.7) | 149.1 (8.2) |
Learning Only (L) | 76.2 (11.4) | 76.6 (10.3) | 77.7 (11.7) |
Exercise Only (E) | 77.8 (15.1) | 144.8 (6.7) | 154.3 (12.6) |
Control Group (C) | 76.7 (12.2) | 77.6 (10.6) | 78.0 (10.3) |
Experiment 3 | |||
Exercise + Learning (E + L) | 80.3 (14.4) | 124.8 (9.9) | 127.3 (6.6) |
Learning Only (L) | 78.8 (15.1) | - | - |
Exercise Only (E) | 77.8 (17.3) | 120.0 (12.1) | 122.8 (8.7) |
Control Group (C) | 74.7 (17.5) | - | - |
Point estimates are means. Variable estimates (in parentheses) are standard deviations. Notably, for Experiments 1 and 2, the learning technique involved the 3-R technique, whereas for Experiment 3, the learning technique was the cue-integration technique. -, not assessed. HR, heart rate.