Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):178. doi: 10.3390/metabo9090178

Table 2.

Description of cachectic, pre-cachectic, and non-cachectic patients.

Cachectic
(n = 16)
Pre-Cachectic
(n = 13)
Non-Cachectic
(n = 23)
p-Value
Age at surgery + 58.38 (±10.33) 55.84 (±11.67) 62.74 (±12.22) 0.21 +
BMI 1 (kg/m2)
at Baseline 2,+ 25.60 (±2.71) 29.39 (±3.35) 26.48 (±4.26) 0.02 +
6 Months afterwards 3,+ 23.37 (±3.08) 28.11 (±3.42) 26.54 (±4.41) 0.004 +
Weight Change (kg) + −7.12 (±3.63) −2.54 (±1.27) 2.78 (±2.68) <0.001 +
Weight Change (%) −0.09 (±0.05) −0.02 (±0.02) 0.03 (±0.03) <0.001 +
Sex 0.33 ++
Male 11 (69%) 11 (85%) 14 (61%)
Female 5 (31%) 2 (15%) 9 (39%)
Stage 0.11 ++
I 5 (31%) 2 (15%) 7 (30%)
II 1 (6%) 5 (38%) 9 (40%)
III 6 (38%) 4 (31%) 7 (30%)
IV 4 (25%) 2 (15%) 0
Site 0.58 ++
Colon 6 (38%) 5 (38%) 12 (52%)
Rectal 10 (62%) 8 (62%) 11(48%)
Adjuvant Therapy 0.14 ++
Yes 10 (62%) 8 (62%) 7 (30%)
No 6 (38%) 5 (38%) 16 (70%)
Neo-Adjuvant Therapy 0.43 ++
Yes 6 (38%) 4 (31%) 6 (26%)
No 10 (62%) 9 (70%) 17 (74%)

1 BMI = body mass index; 2 Baseline as first assessment, either pre-surgery or at 6-month follow-up; 3 follow-up at 6 months after pre-surgery assessment or at 6-month follow-up. + One-way ANOVA was used to compare mean differences across the three different phenotypes for continuous variables. ++ Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to test for distribution differences in categorical variables across the three different phenotypes.