Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):178. doi: 10.3390/metabo9090178

Table 3.

Body composition at baseline in cachectic, pre-cachectic, and non-cachectic patients. +

Cachectic (n = 16) Pre-Cachectic Non-Cachectic p-Value for Group Comparisons
(n = 13) (n = 23) Three Group Comparison Cachectic vs Non-Cachectic Cachectic vs Pre-Cachectic Pre-Cachectic vs Non-Cachectic
Visceral Fat Area
L3/L4 152.93 (±92.56) 231.20 (±68.97) 184.26 (±68.59) 0.08 0.34 0.04 0.11
L4/L5 134.90 (±74.86) 204.51 (±57.86) 154.96 (±51.81) 0.04 0.44 0.03 0.04
Subcutaneous Fat Area
L3/L4 204.58 (±101.90) 301.70 (±125.96) 255.47 (±130.21) 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.39
L4/L5 230.00 (±97.10) 320.38 (±111.91) 286.10 (±125.43) 0.19 0.23 0.06 0.50
Dorsal muscle Area
L3/L4 37.77 (±14.86) 30.31 (16.34) 35.43 (17.25) 0.57 0.72 0.29 0.47
L4/L5 29.44 (±10.26) 21.84 (14.66) 27.93 (11.34) 0.32 0.73 0.18 0.26
Psoas muscle Area
L3/L4 19.30 (±8.57) 18.55 (±6.19) 19.34 (±6.86) 0.96 0.98 0.82 0.77
L4/L5 28.81 (±24.44) 19.29 (±6.58) 22.30 (±7.93) 0.34 0.36 0.25 0.34
Abdominal muscle Area
L3/L4 42.88 (±17.46) 26.02 (±14.07) 34.25 (±15.12) 0.06 0.20 0.03 0.19
L4/L5 36.07 (±14.49) 24.92 (±14.58) 30.01 (±15.61) 0.24 0.33 0.09 0.43

+ One-way ANOVA was used to compare mean differences across the three different phenotypes for continuous variables.