Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 29;55(9):548. doi: 10.3390/medicina55090548

Table 2.

Risk of bias summary.

Question and Nature of the Study [34] [33] [35] [39] [36] [37] [30] [40] [28] [29] [38] [31] [32]
1. Human subjects and detailed description of the sample (validity and reliability studies) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
2. Qualification or competence of rater/s clarified (validity and reliability studies) Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y N Y Y
3. Reference standard explained (validity studies) N/A N/A N/A N N/A N/A N/A N N N N/A Y N
4. Blinding of raters to the findings of other raters (inter-rater reliability studies) Y Y Y N/A N N Y N/A Y Y N/A Y Y
5. Blinding of raters to their own prior findings (intra-rater reliability studies) N/A Y N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N Y Y
6. Variation in order of examination (reliability studies) N N Y N N N Y N/A N N N Y Y
7. Latency between application of reference and index test reasonably (validity studies) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N N N N/A Y N
8. Stability of the variable considered before repeated measures (reliability studies) Y Y Y N/A Y Y Y N/A Y Y Y Y
9.Reference standard independent of the index test (validity studies) N/A N/A N/A N N/A N/A N/A N N N N/A Y N
10. Detailed description of index test (validity and reliability studies) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
11. Detailed execution of reference standard (validity studies) N/A N/A N/A N N/A N/A N/A N N N N/A Y N
12. Explanation of the withdrawals (validity and reliability studies) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y
13. Appropriateness of statistical methods (validity and reliability studies) N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y