Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 8;8(9):1409. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091409

Table 3.

OPL and ONL thickness analysis of diabetic eyes compared with control group.

Subfield Analyzed Diabetic Eyes (n = 34) Control Eyes (n = 32)
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD p Value *
OPL thickness (µm)
1-mm central circle 26.8 ± 4.9 25.9 ± 4.3 0.475
3-mm S subfield 38.0 ± 8.8 35.0 ± 9.9 0.179
6-mm S subfield 27.9 ± 2.8 26.0 ± 3.1 0.015
3-mm I subfield 31.5 ± 4.0 30.7 ± 6.5 0.599
6-mm I subfield 26.5 ± 1.7 24.9 ± 1.8 0.001
3-mm N subfield 32.8 ± 7.7 30.3 ± 4.7 0.133
6-mm N subfield 28.4 ± 2.9 26.4 ± 2.7 0.007
3-mm T subfield 33.8 ± 5.8 34.4 ± 7.0 0.713
6-mm T subfield 27.9 ± 2.1 26.9 ± 3.1 0.132
ONL thickness (µm)
1-mm central circle 91.5 ± 9.3 88.7 ± 11.1 0.274
3-mm S subfield 67.8 ± 11.2 65.7 ± 12.0 0.474
6-mm S subfield 63.4 ± 7.4 61.2 ± 8.1 0.242
3-mm I subfield 72.7 ± 7.8 69.2 ± 9.0 0.100
6-mm I subfield 58.1 ± 7.4 55.4 ± 7.3 0.147
3-mm N subfield 75.1 ± 11.4 74.5 ± 11.2 0.834
6-mm N subfield 61.1 ± 7.5 59.5 ± 8.9 0.438
3-mm T subfield 71.5 ± 10.5 66.6 ± 10.3 0.061
6-mm T subfield 61.4 ± 7.9 56.8 ± 7.1 0.017

OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer; n: number; SD: standard deviation; S: superior; I: inferior; N: nasal; T: temporal; G: central. *: Student’s t test for independent samples.