Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Phys. 2019 Feb 1;383:72–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.01.019

Table 6:

The impact of the accuracy of the inner solver on the performance of the linear solver. The CPU time is collected for the linear solver only; l^ represents the total number of nonlinear iterations; n represents the total number of FGMRES iterations; n¯A represents the averaged number of iterations for solving with A in (4.3) and (4.5); n¯S represents the averaged number of iterations for solving (4.4); n¯I represents the averaged number of iterations for solving (4.6).

δIr CPU time (sec.) l^ n n¯A n¯S n¯I
δAr=δSr=1010 100 7.56 × 101 1 47 16.81 19.81 -
10−2 7.19 × 101 1 9 15.78 58.56 1.95
10−4 6.52 × 101 1 5 15.30 58.80 3.75
10−6 6.20 × 101 1 3 14.33 58.33 7.81
10−8 5.83 × 101 1 2 13.75 59.50 11.85
10−10 7.55 × 101 1 2 13.75 60.00 15.19
δAr=δSr=106 100 4.38 × 101 1 47 7.83 12.02 -
10−2 4.20 × 101 1 9 8.17 34.22 1.97
10−4 3.67 × 101 1 5 7.90 34.40 3.40
10−6 4.73 × 101 1 4 7.50 35.75 7.37
10−8 6.87 × 101 1 4 7.00 35.75 11.50
10−10 8.23 × 101 1 4 7.00 35.75 15.47