Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 22;41(1):22–30. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2018-0021

Table 3. Indices of model fit for healthy controls (n=141) and schizophrenia patients (n=119).

Model χ2 (df) p-value χ2/df CFI SRMR RMSEA AIC NFI
1. One-factor
    Schizophrenia cases 42.86 (20) < 0.002 2.14 0.92 0.06 0.09 90.86 0.87
    Healthy controls 53.71 (20) < 0.001 2.68 0.87 0.08 0.12 101.7 0.82
2. Two-factor models
    a) Updating = shifting
        Schizophrenia cases 36.19 (19) < 0.01 1.91 0.94 0.05 0.08 70.19 0.89
        Healthy controls 43.85 (19) < 0.001 2.31 0.91 0.07 0.10 77.85 0.85
    b) Updating = inhibition
        Schizophrenia cases 34.80 (19) < 0.02 1.83 0.95 0.06 0.08 84.80 0.89
        Healthy controls 51.30 (19) < 0.001 2.70 0.88 0.08 0.12 101.3 0.83
    c) Inhibition = shifting
        Schizophrenia cases 32.16 (19) < 0.03 1.69 0.96 0.05 0.07 82.16 0.90
        Healthy controls 43.35 (19) < 0.001 2.28 0.91 0.07 0.10 93.36 0.85
3. Full three-factor model
    Schizophrenia cases 25.78 (17) 0.08 1.51 0.97 0.04 0.05 79.78 0.95
    Healthy controls 35.71 (17) 0.01 2.10 0.94 0.06 0.07 89.71 0.90
Multiple group CFA
    All factor loadings free to vary between groups (unconstrained) 61.48 (34) 0.003 1.81 0.95 0.04 0.05 169.49 0.90
    Only one factor loading constrained to be equal between groups 398.23 (53) < 0.001 7.51 0.39 0.05 0.15 468.24 0.36
    All estimated factor loadings, as well as factor variances, constrained equal to be between groups 498.34 (61) < 0.001 8.17 0.23 0.08 0.16 552.11 0.20
    All estimated factor loadings, as well as factor variances and covariances, constrained to be equal across groups 305.61 (48) < 0.001 6.36 0.53 0.08 0.14 385.61 0.51

AIC = Akaike’s information criteria; CFA = confirmatory factor analysis; CFI = comparative fit index; df = degrees of freedom; NFI = normed fit index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual.

The CFA and structural equation models were examined using different index fits. The chi-square statistic provides a direct test of differences between the predicted and observed variances and covariances. The probability value associated with χ2 represents the likelihood of obtaining an χ2 that exceeds the χ2 value when H0 is true (Byrne34). χ2/df values less than 2.0 indicate a good model fit (Kline35). The SRMR is the square root of the averaged squared residuals (i.e., differences between the observed and predicted covariances). Values bellow 0.05 indicate a good fit and values less than 0.08 indicate a relatively good fit to the data (Hu & Bentler36). CFI and the Bentler and Bonnet NFI (Bentler & Bonett37) were also used. These include a penalty function for more complex models. CFI and NFI values vary between 0 and 1. A cutoff value close to 0.95 indicates that the model fits the data in that it adequately describes the sample data (Byrne34). The AIC addresses the issue of parsimony in the assessment of model fit (Akaike38). Lower AIC values indicate a good fit.