Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 10;18(5):4629–4638. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10842

Table IV.

Associations of SNPs in selected genes and PFS in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


SNP Outcome mPFS, months Model Log-rank P-value HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI)a P-valuea
KDR rs7692791 PFS General 0.032 0.020 0.012
4.2 CC 0.099b 1.926 (0.859–4.319) 0.112 2.053 (0.855–4.929) 0.107
5.0 CT 0.018b 1.829 (1.091–3.066) 0.022 1.969 (1.150–3.369) 0.013
6.0 TT Reference Reference
Dominant 0.009 0.010 0.006
6.0 TT Reference Reference
5.0 CC+CT 1.892 (1.156–3.098) 0.011 1.982 (1.196–3.284) 0.008
KDR rs1870377 PFS General 0.030 0.017 0.127
4.0 AA 0.005b 3.221 (1.356–7.651) 0.008 2.892 (0.987–8.474) 0.053
5.5 AT 0.015b 2.545 (1.159–5.589) 0.020 1.778 (0.724–4.366) 0.209
10.0 TT Reference Reference
Dominant 0.008 0.009 0.051
10.0 TT Reference Reference
4.5 AA+AT 2.618 (1.235–5.550) 0.012 1.970 (0.861–4.503) 0.108
NRP-1 rs2065364 PFS Recessive 0.015 0.017 0.004
8.0 AA Reference Reference
4.5 AG+GG 2.896 (1.159–7.237) 0.023 3.905 (1.485–10.268) 0.006
a

Adjusted for age, sex, N stage, TNM stage, platinum included or not and differentiation.

b

Bonferroni-adjusted P-value=0.05/2, so P<0.025 was considered statistically significant. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; KDR, kinase insert domain receptor; NRP-1, neuropilin-1; PFS, progression-free survival; mPFS, median progression-free survival; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.