Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 19;2014(9):CD002063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002063.pub6

Bril 1996.

Methods Randomised
 Single centre
 Parallel group
Participants Adult
 N = 50
Interventions IVIg 0.5 g/kg daily for 4 days versus PE 40 mL/kg to 50 mL/kg on 5 occasions over 7 to 10 days
Outcomes Multiple
 See text of review
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "Patients were randomly allocated to either PE or IVIg". Method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk "Patients were randomly allocated to either PE or IVIg". Method not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes except death High risk Open study
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Death Low risk Reporting of death unlikely to be biased by lack of blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes except death High risk 6 PE and 0 IVIg excluded because of protocol violations
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Death Low risk Reporting of death likely to have been complete
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk 6 were subsequently excluded from further analysis as a result of protocol violations; all were in the PE‐treated group
Other bias Low risk None detected
Diagnostic criteria Low risk NINCDS criteria for GBS
Baseline differences Low risk No significant differences in age, gender or severity