Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: Natl Tax J. 2017 Mar;70(1):77–110. doi: 10.17310/ntj.2017.1.03

Table 7.

Determinants of the Probability of Participants Defaulting on 401(k) Plan Loans Outstanding upon Job Termination

Probability of defaulting on 401(k) loans outstanding (Probit)
Mean Estimate (SE) Marginal effect (%)
Plan design factors
Multiple loans allowed 0.48 −0.063 *** 0.010 −1.15
Loan interest rate (%) 7.08 −0.004 0.003 −0.07
Participant characteristics
Age 35–45 0.31 −0.029 0.013 −0.53
Age 45–55 0.26 −0.040 *** 0.014 −0.73
Age 55–60 0.10 0.021 0.019 0.37
Age > 60 0.07 0.070 *** 0.022 1.23
Male 0.48 0.010 0.011 0.19
Tenure 8.47 −0.003 0.002 −0.05
Tenure**2 118.21 0.000 0.000 0.00
Income < $35,000 0.15 0.044 *** 0.015 0.78
Income > $87,500 0.27 −0.097 *** 0.011 −1.82
Low wealth 0.65 0.115 *** 0.011 2.15
High wealth 0.11 −0.140 *** 0.015 −2.73
Ln(401(k) account balance) 9.88 −0.400 *** 0.007 −3.34
Ln Loan balance 8.11 0.282 *** 0.004 82.37
Macroeconomic variables
Financial turmoil period (%) 0.22 0.033 ** 0.017 0.60
Lagged state unemployment rate (%) 5.36 −0.003 0.004 −0.06
Industry controls Yes
Plan mean variables Yes
Intercept 2.324 *** 0.134
No. observations 151,458
Mean of dependent variable 0.86
Pseudo R-squared 0.121

Note:

**

Significant at 0.05 level,

***

significant at 0.01 level.

Plan means included to control for fixed effects.