Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 1;10:1175. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01175

Table 2.

Stakeholders’ preference on access.

Material scope Temporal
scope
Utilization scope Preconditions Regulatory mechanisms Granting
authority
Standardization Mandatory local partner Facilitated access Renegotiability
Providers In situ, ex situ, and for DSI Access for utilization Development Mandatory benefit-sharing agreement Permit-based access Centralized single institution Case by case Mandatory local partner Facilitated access for non-commercial research Renegotiable when user and intent change
Academic Users In situ and exsitu access Access for sampling
and access for utilization
Development No mandatory benefit-sharing agreement Notification-based access Centralized single institution Case by case No mandatory local partner Facilitated access for non-commercial research Renegotiable when user and intent change
Industrial Users In situ and exsitu access Access for utilization Development Mandatory benefit-sharing agreement Notification-based access Centralized single institution Standardized and case by case1 No mandatory local partner Facilitated access for non-commercial research Renegotiable when user and intent change
Collections In situ and exsitu access Access for utilization Research No mandatory benefit-sharing agreement Notification-based access Centralized single institution Standardized No mandatory local partner Facilitated access for non-commercial research Renegotiable when user and intent change

1There was no consensus among industrial users regarding this option.