Skip to main content
. 1999 Jul 1;19(13):5435–5448. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-13-05435.1999

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10.

Coherence differences in four subjects.Left, Coherence difference matrices, plotted as described in Figure 9. Note that most coherences are higher during dominance. The summed squared coherence differences were significant (p < 0.05) in each subject as determined by the use of a randomization test. Right, Topographic map of robust coherence differences, plotted as described in Figure9.