Skip to main content
. 1999 Dec 1;19(23):10428–10437. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-23-10428.1999

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Alternation learning impairments in R6/2 mice. R6/2 mice (n = 15) were impaired in T-maze alternation (A) but unimpaired in a simple T-maze black–white visual discrimination test (B), compared with controls (n = 13). Whereas control mice adopted spatial strategies, R6/2 mice used nonspatial strategies (C). Symbols indicate means ± SEM by mice of each group on each measure. Asterisksindicate significant differences between control and R6/2 mice (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01).