Skip to main content
. 1999 Jun 1;19(11):4585–4594. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-11-04585.1999

Table 1.

Mean number of trials ± SEM for the three measures in Experiments 1–4 under the different testing and drug conditions

Acquisition criterion Trials to criterion No. of probe trials
Experiment 1
 Place version
   Vehicle–vehicle 57.6  ± 12.7 63.1  ± 12.9 2.0  ± 0.7
   Vehicle–tetracaine 50.3  ± 6.6 55.8  ± 7.4 1.8  ± 0.5
   Tetracaine–vehicle 38.7  ± 4.3 60.3  ± 7.0* 4.8  ± 1.4**
 Response version
  Vehicle– vehicle 64.7  ± 11.0 64.7  ± 11.0 1.0  ± 0.0
   Vehicletetracaine 108.3  ± 6.2** 110.8  ± 5.1** 1.3  ± 0.3
   Tetracainevehicle 68.5  ± 11.6 68.5  ± 11.6 1.0  ± 0.0
Experiment 2
 Response version
   Vehicle–vehicle 57.5  ± 13.6 70.3  ± 10.3 2.3  ± 0.6
   Vehicle–tetracaine 68.2  ± 10.6 73.0  ± 10.6 1.8  ± 0.5
   Tetracaine–vehicle 51.0  ± 14.7 51.0  ± 14.7 1.0  ± 0.0
 Place version
  Vehicle– vehicle 36.2  ± 4.2 37.8  ± 4.7 1.2  ± 0.2
  Vehicle– tetracaine 62.7  ± 7.8** 67.3  ± 9.7** 1.8  ± 0.5
  Tetracaine– vehicle 40.0  ± 5.5 44.2  ± 3.9 1.7  ± 0.3
Experiment 3
 Place acquisition
   Vehicle–vehicle 56.4  ± 12.8 68.0  ± 10.5 2.2  ± 0.7
   Vehicle–tetracaine 61.2  ± 12.0 64.2  ± 12.4 1.6  ± 0.2
 Place reversal
  Vehicle– vehicle 52.6  ± 6.4 55.6  ± 5.6 1.6  ± 0.6
  Vehicle– tetracaine 59.4  ± 3.8 69.8  ± 8.0 2.2  ± 0.6
Experiment 4
 Response acquisition
   Vehicle–vehicle 68.2  ± 13.4 72.6  ± 14.4 1.6  ± 0.2
   Vehicle–tetracaine 70.0  ± 18.5 79.2  ± 17.8 1.8  ± 0.4
 Response reversal
  Vehicle– vehicle 71.6  ± 15.8 75.6  ± 14.9 1.4  ± 0.4
  Vehicle– tetracaine 72.0  ± 15.7 73.4  ± 16.0 1.2  ± 0.3

Underlined is the treatment administered for that condition.

*p < 0.05 versus acquisition criterion.

**p < 0.05 versus vehicle-injected controls.